By Months: Henn Põlluaas

The political stance centers on strong opposition to the provisions of the incarceration law that allow dangerous criminals, particularly sex offenders arriving from Sweden, to receive leave from prison. The primary emphasis is on public safety and the lack of a sense of security among residents. The position is strongly value-based, stressing the necessity of protecting ordinary people from "pedophiles and rapists."

The political stance heavily focuses on defending current social policies, particularly regarding the support and benefits provided to Ukrainian war refugees under temporary protection. It stresses that these individuals are entitled to the same benefits as permanent residents of Estonia. Furthermore, it rejects assertions that mobilized men are being sent to the front lines without adequate training. This position is fact-based and designed to correct the misinformation propagated by the opposition.

The speaker maintains a strongly results-oriented position and is critical of the government's inaction, particularly in the defense sector and legislative procedures. They aggressively advocate for the development of national defense capabilities, including the production of landmines, and sharply oppose bills that lack the required impact assessment. Furthermore, they adopt a strong ethical stance against corruption and the lack of accountability (referencing the Slava Ukraini scandal).

The political position is strongly oriented toward national security and sovereignty, supporting the deployment of anti-personnel mines and opposing the judicial challenging of visa bans. Furthermore, the speaker sharply criticizes the government's economic policy, accusing the prime minister of denying the rising tax burden amidst rampant inflation. The focus is value-based (sovereignty) and results-based (criticism of government actions).

The political platform is fiercely anti-government, centered on criticizing both fiscal policy—specifically the funding of local municipalities and the coverage of defense expenditures—and regulatory policy, particularly concerning energy and what they term the "green frenzy" (or "eco-hysteria"). The most intense stance relates to national defense, where they urgently call for withdrawal from the Ottawa Convention, deeming continued adherence to it suicidal. The overall political framework is primarily designed to expose the government's operational inefficiency and its economy-wrecking policies.

The political position is strongly conservative and protective of the role of institutions, emphasizing the necessity of preserving the sovereignty and decision-making authority of the Riigikogu against governmental overreach. The speaker vigorously opposes gender quotas and radical left ideological pressure. Furthermore, they criticize the government's inaction concerning environmental issues (cormorants) and energy policy (CO2 quotas). This stance represents consistent and strong opposition to government-initiated bills that restrict national sovereignty and parliamentary oversight.

The political focus is heavily directed towards ensuring national defense and security, emphasizing the urgent need for domestic ammunition production and Estonia's position as a frontline state. Another significant issue is the catastrophic demographic crisis, where the government is criticized for its inaction and for cutting family benefits. The viewpoints are predominantly oppositional and forceful, focusing on the government's inefficiency and the drawn-out nature of decision-making. The political framework is primarily results-oriented, criticizing the government's inability to adequately respond to crises.

The political position is strongly opposed to maintaining the voting rights of non-citizens and citizens of aggressor states in local elections, viewing this as a direct threat to Estonia's security and the constitutional objective of preserving the Estonian nation. The speaker stresses the necessity of revoking voting rights from all non-citizens and calls for strict security vetting for citizenship applicants. The position is strongly value-driven and framed primarily around security concerns, warning against the "entrenchment" of this situation within the constitution.

The political stance is heavily focused on issues of national defense and sovereignty, demanding an immediate investment of 1.6 billion euros into ammunition. The speaker vigorously opposes the car tax, viewing it as nothing more than seizing the people's money. The central framework is value-based, emphasizing the protection of the foundations of Estonian statehood and preventing the repetition of historical errors.