By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The style of the speech is highly informative, humorous, and festive, utilizing the figure of Santa Claus and the context of a gift presentation. Although the tone is light and conversational, it incorporates political symbolism (a reference to gender neutrality and the EKRE party). The speaker employs emotional and cultural appeals.

The rhetorical style is formal, but in a lengthy speech, it becomes highly critical and cautionary, employing an urgent tone. Strong emotional appeals are utilized (health risks, environmental devastation) alongside figurative language to paint a negative picture of Estonia as a "massive power plant" and a "tangle of high-voltage power lines." The argumentation is a blend of political value criticism and the presentation of technical concerns.

The rhetorical style is combative, condemnatory, and emotional, employing strong ideological analogies (communism, planned economy) and cautionary language. Rhetorical questions and exaggerations are used (e.g., hiring homosexual leaders to avoid a fine), and appeals are made to the listeners' sense of shame or compassion. The discourse is direct and emphasizes ideological conflict.

The style of communication is formal and analytical, focusing on facts and logical clarity. When asking questions, the speaker quotes the presenter directly from the transcript to ensure precision and avoid misinterpretation. The tone is neutral and businesslike, aimed solely at obtaining information.

The speaker's style is insistent and critical, frequently employing words such as "crisis," "irresponsible," and "essential" to underscore the gravity of the situation. He/She balances logical appeals (statistical data) with emotional appeals, referring to the threat of national decline and the fears of local residents. Numerous rhetorical questions are used to call the government's actions into question.

The speaker adopts a critical and insistent style, focusing on logical arguments regarding economic and administrative consequences. Rhetorical questions are employed to underscore the deficiencies of the draft bill and urge a more balanced approach. The tone remains formal and analytical, stressing the danger posed to the business environment and public well-being.

The speaker's rhetorical style is serious, pressing, and emotionally charged, emphasizing moral obligation and the vulnerability of children. They employ a logical structure (problem introduction, statistical evidence, ethical questions), but primarily appeal to the listeners' conscience, using phrases such as "Every child is worth their weight in gold." During the Q&A session, they are direct and insistent, demanding a clear answer from the minister.