By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

Economic considerations pertain to the financial impact of the regulation, requiring that fine amounts be determined rationally and based on an impact assessment. The speaker questions the government’s ability to impose financial penalties objectively.

Economic views are strongly focused on the need for economic growth and exiting the crisis. The speaker is skeptical of regulations (climate goals) that are allegedly meant to nudge the economy upwards, but which instead result in a deep downturn, thereby pointing to the necessity of changing current economic management.

Insufficient data.

Economic perspectives focus on the regulation and transparency of public procurement, demanding strict ethical and legal compliance when utilizing state funds. The necessity of preventing bias and conflicts of interest in major defense investments is underscored.

There is too little data.

Not enough data

Insufficient data.

There is too little data.

The speaker acknowledges the poor state of the national budget but uses this very point to underscore the necessity of prioritizing support for children and large families. Their position is that, given the demographic crisis, children are paramount. This indicates a preference for social investment over fiscal austerity achieved by cutting family benefits.

Not enough data.

Insufficient data.

The economic outlook is critical regarding the tax burden and social justice, specifically challenging the impact of the proposed car tax on families. In terms of labor policy, there is support for stricter regulation concerning the introduction of foreign labor, aimed at guaranteeing that the same requirements and conditions apply as those for local workers, thereby addressing the concerns raised by trade unions.