By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

There is not enough data.

There is too little data.

The speaker was highly active during the April 17th plenary session, consecutively posing four strongly focused questions and making statements regarding the topic of e-voting. This demonstrates concentrated activity during the discussion of a specific legislative topic. He/She also requested additional minutes to present his/her views in greater detail.

The pattern of activity is limited to participation in the Riigikogu information hour, during which the speaker poses consecutive, mutually complementary questions focusing on one narrow topic. Both substantive questions and procedural intervention were utilized to underscore the minister's accountability.

There isn't enough data.

Data on the patterns of activity is scarce, confined to submitting interpellations and asking clarifying questions during the plenary session of the Riigikogu. This demonstrates activity in holding the minister accountable and challenging specific regulations.

The data shows two brief interventions during a single plenary session: the first was a substantive question regarding language policy, and the second was the presentation of a procedural remark to the presiding officer. No other patterns of activity could be identified.

There is too little data.

All contributions take the form of questions directed at the ministers during the plenary session. The speaker utilizes follow-up questions to emphasize their dissatisfaction with the lack of answers and to insist upon strict procedural compliance. These questions are prompted by recent events and subsequent media coverage (for example, the Valga incident and the visit to India).

The speaker was an active questioner during the plenary session, posing four specific questions in a short period of time concerning the details of the draft bill under debate and its practical consequences. This pattern of activity indicates a focus on the thorough analysis of a specific legislative topic through questioning.

The pattern of activity indicates active participation in the plenary session through the submission of questions, focusing on one specific legislative topic (food safety regulations). The speaker poses a series of consecutive follow-up questions to ensure the thorough handling of the subject and the informing of consumers.

The data indicates active participation in the plenary session during the question submission phase, focusing on several different but related topics within a short period of time. All four addresses were delivered during a single session day. Data concerning other activities is unavailable.