By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The data indicates active participation in posing questions during the plenary session, notably including two direct follow-up questions on the same topic, suggesting a persistent desire for a comprehensive response.

The data indicates participation in the plenary session, involving both asking questions of the rapporteur and stating the faction's position on the draft bill. There is no data regarding the frequency, rhythm, or other patterns of activity outside the Riigikogu session.

The speaker was active during the plenary session, presenting both an interpellation to the minister regarding data protection and a report on the draft bill submitted by EKRE concerning the development of methods for increasing the birth rate. This demonstrates active involvement in the legislative process and holding ministers accountable.

Data is available for only two questions asked during the Riigikogu information session, which indicates activity in the oversight of the executive branch's operations. Data is lacking regarding broader activity patterns (meetings, travel, frequency of public appearances).

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, submitting repeated questions and inquiries concerning education, environment, and agricultural topics. All these appearances were concentrated into a single day of the session, indicating an intense focus on scrutinizing the government's actions. This pattern of activity involves challenging the ministers' responses and demanding supplementary information.