By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for political incompetence, "institutional cover-up" (or "bureaucratic cronyism"), and a lack of transparency. The government is also accused of imposing a green transition that is both anti-environmental and totalitarian in nature, as well as deliberately weakening national defense capabilities (the scrapping of helicopters and ships). No compromise is being offered; instead, a complete change in the direction of policy is demanded.

The criticism is directed at the inefficiency of institutional management (the lapse of internal control at the Ministry of Defence) and policies that have restricted the hunting of game animals. The speaker suggests that these hunting restrictions stem from "green transition arguments" or other unreasonable causes, which have inflicted enormous damage on farmers.

The main opponents are the minister under questioning, members of the Reform Party, the prime minister, and everyone who supported threatening the conference or remained silent. The criticism is intense and personal (focusing on lying and scandalous behavior) and centers on the restriction of free speech and the damaging of Estonia-US relations. Compromise is ruled out; an unconditional apology is demanded.

The confrontation is intense and is aimed at both the government and the Riigikogu (Parliament) board, criticizing both political inaction and undemocratic procedures (such as all-night sessions and committee work). The main opponents are Interior Minister Läänemets and Education Minister Kallas, who are accused of misleading the public and spreading extremist ideology. Socialists are also criticized for sacrificing historical democracy.