By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

There is no data regarding cooperation; the speaker’s style is purely confrontational and critical. The speaker is rather calling on others (e.g., doctors from the Reform Party) to rebel against their own party and refuse to cooperate with them. No willingness to cooperate is expressed.

Not enough data

Insufficient data

The speaker strongly emphasized international cooperation, naming Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland as both role models and partners. He called for close collaboration with Ukrainian historians and legal experts in the investigation of communist crimes, offering assistance with the digitalization of archives. Domestically, it was stressed that historical work is a collective task, not solely the job of historians.

The collaborative style is respectful and dialogue-oriented, involving addressing the presenter directly to obtain additional information and recommendations. The speaker attempts to further develop the topic emphasized by the presenter, while searching for practical solutions.

There is too little data.

The collaborative style is demanding and confrontational, requiring the rapporteur and the coalition to immediately remove a specific point. Although the purpose of multiple readings in identifying deficiencies is acknowledged, the willingness to compromise on this child protection issue is near zero. Cooperation is viewed only in the context of halting the draft bill or withdrawing a specific provision.

The speaker emphasizes the value of cross-party cooperation and consensus, citing as a positive example the previous agreement to increase family benefits—an issue they equate in importance to national defense. Disappointment is now expressed that the government’s first action was to unilaterally scrap this powerful cross-party achievement.

Few details are available regarding the style of cooperation, but reference is made to Martin Helme's stance on the scale of immigration, which indicates ideological alignment within the opposition. Information is lacking regarding any readiness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.

Data is scarce.