By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The political position is strongly value-based and oppositional, emphasizing that values take precedence over tax and economic issues. The most salient topics are the demand for reducing Russian influence (especially concerning voting rights) and extremely strong opposition to gender ideology. The speaker criticizes the government for its inconsistency in diminishing Russian influence and accuses them of degrading society.

The speaker positions himself as a strong opponent of leftist ideological demands and the social justice agenda (which he labels as Marxist). The primary concern is the harassment of business owners and the increase in administrative burden, which hinders profit generation. The stance is strongly oppositional and value-driven, focusing on the ideological direction of the government's policy.

The political position is strongly protective of national sovereignty, opposing the Minister of Justice’s plan to develop cross-border prison tourism and business, which is regarded as an attack on the principles of the nation-state. The criticism is value-based, accusing the government of pursuing an unconstitutional vision and zealously promoting "cross-border" ideas. The speaker warns that such a policy will turn Estonia into the "Siberia of Europe."

The political focus is heavily directed toward historical justice and the condemnation of Soviet genocide crimes, particularly those committed against the Crimean Tatars and Ingrians. The speaker stresses Estonia's moral obligation to remember the repressed and to serve as an example for other nations in recognizing crimes of genocide. This stance is clearly value-based, demanding the continuation of the investigation into these crimes and the establishment of a dedicated investigative bureau. He/She emphasizes that no occupation or annexation must ever be justified or recognized.

The political focus is directed toward the topics of climate protection and energy conservation, emphasizing the need for concrete recommendations concerning the efforts of ordinary Estonian households. The stance is primarily centered on policy implementation and practical priorities, seeking solutions that would reduce the burden on households. The speaker actively asks where the average person should save, besides energy, in order to protect the climate.

The political position is strongly critical of the government's decision to raise the co-payment fee during a recession, arguing that this will deepen poverty. The main emphasis is placed on social justice and mitigating the rise in poverty, questioning both the timing of the policy and its social impact. The stance is clearly focused on alleviating the social consequences, rather than fundamentally challenging the policy on value-based grounds.

The political agenda centers on child protection and preventing convicted individuals from being employed in positions involving children. The speaker is vehemently opposed to a specific provision in the draft bill, calling it the most anti-child measure seen in the last 10 to 20 years. This stance is clearly value-driven and prioritizes the safety of children, warning against legislative setbacks.

The political focus is heavily directed towards issues of demography and family policy, emphasizing the value placed on large families and the increase of family benefits. The speaker expresses strong opposition to the government's decision to revoke the previous cross-party consensus concerning the increase in benefits. The political framework is strongly value-based, stressing the need to support families who made decisions based on earlier promises.

The political position is strongly opposed to tripling the immigration quota, viewing it as an unacceptable and irresponsible approach. The focus is value-based, highlighting the threat posed to the Estonian language, national identity, and the risk of Estonians becoming a minority in the capital city. The speaker uses historical parallels (Stalin's era, Lasnamäe) to underscore the scale of the situation.

The political stance is strongly anti-government, focusing primarily on high energy prices, which are linked to the green transition, and inefficient infrastructure development. The criticism targets the results and implementation of these policies, especially concerning international projects and the development of Ida-Virumaa. The speaker stresses that as long as electricity prices remain triple what they were, a large number of things in the country will simply not succeed.