By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The speeches were delivered during the plenary session, likely as part of a motion of no confidence or an interpellation, referencing the "subject of the no-confidence vote" and emphasizing the futility of continuing the parliamentary debate. The speaker is a vocal critic in parliamentary debates, utilizing their addresses to challenge the government's direction and core values. Other activity patterns (such as meetings or travel) are not documented.

Based on the data, activity is evident during the plenary session, where repeated questions and criticism were leveled at the government minister. The speaker is focusing on one specific topic—the regulatory burden and the requirements of social justice.

Insufficient data

Insufficient Data

According to the data, the speaker's activity is linked to the submission of questions to the presenter during the plenary session. There is insufficient information regarding patterns or frequency of occurrence.

There is too little data.

The speeches were delivered during the Riigikogu's plenary session and refer to recent events within the committees and the Riigikogu itself ("the picture scandal"). The speaker is active during the phase of legislative debates, where it is possible to halt or amend bills. There is no data available regarding the frequency of their appearances or other activity patterns outside of the Riigikogu's work.

Not enough data.

Insufficient data

The speaker is participating in the plenary session, posing specific questions to the rapporteur and the minister regarding infrastructure and energy policy. Data regarding the regularity of their appearances or other activity patterns is scarce.