By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

The speaker adopts a clearly opposing stance on restricting voting rights, arguing that it undermines democracy and national security. He connects internal security with social cohesion and warns that the exclusion of 130,000 people could turn them against the state. The speaker stresses that the true objective is to weaken political competition, specifically the Centre Party.

The position strongly articulates a social democratic platform, centering on the protection of the most vulnerable groups: the elderly, low-income earners, and families with many children. It adopts a clearly adversarial position concerning the government’s tax hikes and cuts to benefits. It stresses the necessity of targeted support and criticizes the current policy as both inadequate and unfair.

The speaker adopts a distinctly critical stance regarding the government’s engagement practices, emphasizing that mere formal consultation yields no real results. They strongly advocate for the interests of pensioners and demand that the majority opinion be genuinely taken into account, rather than just being superficially acknowledged.

The speaker adopts a clearly oppositional stance toward the governing coalition, accusing it of neglecting the populace and failing to deliver on political promises. He strongly advocates for a reduction of the VAT rate in the catering sector, stressing its crucial importance for the welfare of the Estonian people. Furthermore, he criticizes the government's decisions concerning Rail Baltic and rolling stock issues, asserting that the country is "at a standstill."

The speaker clearly adopts a stance in support of extending foreign missions, heavily emphasizing Estonia's international obligations and alliance relationships. Regarding the issue of infrastructure taxes, clear opposition is voiced, but a constructive alternative is offered: directing the funds to a dedicated, purpose-specific fund for road and environmental maintenance. Both positions are fundamentally motivated and strongly articulated.

The speaker firmly supports the shift to Estonian-language education but voices realistic concerns regarding its practical implementation. They stress the necessity of guaranteeing the accessibility and quality of education throughout the transition period, with a specific focus on teacher training and qualifications.

The speaker strongly supports European Union integration but emphasizes the need for reduced bureaucracy and administrative simplification. They champion democratic values, the principles of the rule of law, and the protection of member state sovereignty. The speaker advocates for a balanced approach, ensuring that EU policy is effective but does not burden member states with excessive regulations and reporting requirements.

The speaker clearly states their position that current anti-drug measures are insufficient and demands stricter legislative solutions. They express strong concern over the worsening drug problem, emphasizing that the situation has not improved over the years. Regarding regional policy issues, they demand clear answers concerning the closure of schools and the construction of the government building.