By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

The speaker focused specifically on the bill restricting voting rights, criticizing its urgent processing without any thorough analysis. He/She stressed that nobody knows the true impact the bill will have on security or democracy, and demanded more comprehensive consideration before its adoption.

Focuses on social policy issues, especially improving benefit systems. Calls for the implementation of a targeted benefits scheme to assist the most vulnerable families. Takes a critical stance regarding the cutting of existing benefits.

Focuses on improving the processes of engagement and consultation in lawmaking. It criticizes the education agreement as a document lacking substance and demands that the legislative process genuinely take into account the viewpoints of interest groups.

The focus is on the VAT reduction bill for the catering sector, emphasizing its repeated failure to pass in parliament. There is also interest in the work of the Rail Baltic investigative committee and its potential alternative solutions. Specific questions are posed regarding the practical consequences of legislative initiatives, showing a clear interest in the effectiveness of policy measures.

The focus is on the bills extending foreign missions, which are strongly supported. Regarding the infrastructure tax, it adopts an oppositional stance but offers constructive amendments aimed at improving the legislation. Both issues touch upon crucial areas of national policy.

Focuses on the practical application of education legislation, particularly the aspects concerning the transition to Estonian-language instruction. Also interested in teacher qualification requirements, the mechanisms for meeting them, and the organization of vocational education.

Focuses on the implementation of EU policy and the improvement of administrative procedures. Raises the issue of making subsidies for the renovation of apartment buildings more effective. Stresses the need to simplify access to EU support funds and reduce the reporting burden. Shows interest in finding practical solutions for overcoming bureaucratic hurdles.

It directly asks whether, and which, drug control laws should be amended. The focus is on finding legislative solutions to resolve the drug problem. It demonstrates an interest in modifying specific legal acts to improve the situation.