By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

There is insufficient data regarding economic views.

Strongly supports state intervention to alleviate economic hardship through targeted support. It criticizes tax hikes and excise duty increases as measures that burden citizens. It shows a clear preference for strengthening social protection for economically vulnerable groups.

It supports the funding of pensioners' associations, indicating a preference for social spending. It criticizes government decisions that conflict with the stance of interest groups on economic issues.

Strongly supports lowering the VAT, especially in the catering sector, emphasizing its positive impact on both consumers and businesses. Expresses concern regarding the balance of the state treasury, inquiring about compensation mechanisms. Criticizes the sale of state assets (railway rolling stock), preferring state control over strategic objects. Shows support for small and medium-sized enterprises.

Expresses clear opposition to new taxes but acknowledges the need for infrastructure funding. It supports the targeted use of funds and criticizes channeling money into the general budget. It emphasizes practical economic necessities such as road construction and the financing of public transport.

There is not enough data.

Supports the more efficient use of EU support funds and the reduction of bureaucracy during the implementation of economic measures. It emphasizes the need to simplify procedures so that "Member States can utilize resources for practical implementation." It advocates for supporting innovation and entrepreneurial growth while avoiding over-regulation. Expresses concern regarding unspent EU funds.

Based on the data, the information is insufficient.