By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

The criticism is aimed at the outcomes of the commission's debate or at those offering simplified solutions who assume that either education or the private sector can solve every problem. This opposition is policy-driven, highlighting the insufficiency of such solutions when it comes to addressing shortcomings in state capacity.

The main opponents are the Reform Party and the Centre Party. The Reform Party is criticized for backtracking on promises (free kindergarten places) and simplifying nature conservation, as well as for an unfair regional focus. The Centre Party is criticized for excessive self-praise, the chaotic nature of Tallinn's Green Capital period, and the lack of substantive action. In the context of labor law, the critic slams the government for using strong-arm tactics that prioritize employers over employees, while completely ignoring trade union protests.

The main confrontation is with the government and the coalition, who are accused of permitting the desecration of holy sites and adopting a technocratic mindset. The criticism is extremely intense, labeling the actions "brutal marauding" and casting doubt on the government's comprehension of cultural values. He/She suggests that the government's inaction could even lead to the felling of trees in churchyards and cemeteries.

The opposition is aimed at those who favor lengthy, multi-stage judicial proceedings, which, in the speaker's view, impede the accountability of monopolistic interests. The criticism is procedural, challenging the opposing party's assertions regarding the law serving narrow interests and referencing their past positions on avoiding sanctions.