By Agendas: Tiit Maran

Total Agendas: 70

Fully Profiled: 70

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-15
First reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Earth Crust Act, the Land Cadastre Act, and the State Assets Act (Development of renewable energy production in an area with a mining permit) (698 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The main criticism is directed at the Ministry of Climate, faulting it for a one-sided approach (focusing only on energy) and the failure to involve experts from key departments (climate, biodiversity) during the drafting of the bill. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, emphasizing the absence of analyses in the explanatory memorandum.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-15
Border Security

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

There is no direct confrontation with the policy objectives. Instead, controlling questions are being raised concerning the actions and procedures (specifically, the handling of environmental values) of the government (the Prime Minister). The criticism focuses more on clarifying the implementation process and the feasibility of the timeline.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
809 On the Future of the Climate Law

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the government coalition, particularly the Reform Party, which is being criticized for breaking its promises regarding the Climate Law and for substantive flaws in the draft bill. Criticism is also leveled at the minister (Sutt) due to a lack of clarity and procedural deficiencies, especially concerning the failure to confirm the LULUCF positions. The speaker warns that the actual culprits might end up being rewarded while the project itself is forgotten.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
Interpellation concerning the necessity and timeliness of establishing a general quiet period during the breeding season (No. 804)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The position is contrary to that of the Estonian Employers' Confederation, which would restrict the nesting quiet period solely to protected areas, viewing this as being in conflict with the European Court of Justice ruling. The criticism targets a specific political proposal that places economic interests ahead of environmental protection.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
Inquiry concerning the revenue base of local governments (No. 802)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

There is a complete absence of criticism or confrontation in the address; the focus is instead directed toward getting explanations and comparative examples from the minister.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (661 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at the commission or the speaker who rejected the bill, criticizing their analysis and decision-making process. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the alleged failure to account for international practice and the unreliability of arguments concerning the certainty of price reduction.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the transfer of Swedish criminals to Estonia (No. 803)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the minister, whose claims regarding the severity of prisoners' sentences are contradictory and raise doubts. The criticism targets the credibility and transparency of the information presented by the government, demanding a clear answer about which criminals are being brought into Estonia.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
The Chancellery of the Riigikogu agreement with the law firm Sorainen OÜ: "Deregulation and nature conservation restrictions in forest management – an international comparison and proposals for Estonia."

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing

The main opponents are the Government Office and the Council for Efficiency and Economic Growth, who are criticized for procedural errors and political bias. The criticism is intense, accusing the Council of exceeding its mandate and acting in the business interests of the raw materials industry, which is due to over-extraction.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Request for information regarding the establishment of a business council and the potential conflicts of interest of its members (no. 788)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is directed at the government, which is accused of granting a fast track to a circle of favored large entrepreneurs and potentially giving the impression of corruption. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural failures, the risk of conflicts of interest, and the disregard for the public interest. Separately, the financial backers of the governing parties are being criticized for serving as council members.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Education policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.

The main confrontation is with the system and officials of the Ministry of Education, who are criticized for their mechanistic approach and disregard for procedure. The criticism is intense because the ministry proceeded with the matter despite the commission's unambiguous opposition, thereby essentially nullifying the commission's work. The speaker questions the ministry's adherence to the decisions made by parliamentary committees.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

There is no direct opposition, but the speaker raises a critical question concerning the insufficient emphasis placed on environmental and climate issues within the presentation. This criticism is thematic and procedural, rather than personal, and is intended to prevent any misleading impression.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
Inquiry regarding educational inequality (no. 795)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

Criticism is directed at the actions of the Ministry of Climate, as this institution is significantly reducing the scope allocated to nature education. The opposition is policy-driven, focusing on the institution's inability to fulfill its role in ensuring environmental education.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
Inquiry Regarding Latvian Red Beetles in Estonia (no. 796)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at illegal activity (the unauthorized release of animals into the wild) and indirectly at the authorities, should they treat the problem too narrowly as an isolated incident. Specific political opponents are not named.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
An inquiry regarding the hindrance of development in the defence industry (no 783)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at the government and the ministry, accusing them of procedural errors and non-compliance with the Planning Act. Criticism is also aimed at the minister's attempt to blame the judicial system for failing to grasp the urgency. It is emphasized that the government must be held accountable for the correctness of its decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry Regarding the Development of Nuclear Energy in Estonia (No. 786)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the government's (the Minister's Advisor's) vague and potentially contradictory policy concerning the funding of nuclear energy. The criticism is political and financial, centered on the instability and demanding a clear projection of taxpayer costs.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponents are the government coalition, the Minister of Energy and Environment, and the head of government. Criticism is aimed at procedural shortcomings, lack of transparency, and the potential issue of exceeding authority (in the case of the Council of Entrepreneurs). The intensity of the opposition is high because there is suspicion that private interests are being prioritized over public interests.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a Proposal to the Government of the Republic" (630 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed against the simplified positions of previous discussants or the commission, which overly emphasized the role of education, action plans, or the private sector. The objection is aimed at political solutions that fail to take into account the actual capacity of state bodies to investigate fraud. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Draft Law Amending the Employment Contracts Act and Other Acts (602 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the initiators and supporters of the bill, who are criticized for procedural violations (lack of negotiations) and the use of strong-arm tactics. The criticism is intense and focuses on the policy's bias in favor of businesses at the expense of workers. The opposition is principled and is connected to widespread protests by trade unions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Draft Law on the Organisation of Research and Development Activities and Innovation (554 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Direct opponents are not named, but criticism is levied against potential future political forces who might misuse provisions allowing them to influence funding. Also criticized is the abuse of academic freedom occurring within universities (for example, speaking on behalf of the university) and the suppression of dissenting views. The critique targets both political risk and ethical conduct.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main targets of criticism are the Reform Party and the Centre Party. The Reform Party is sharply criticized for backtracking on promises and lacking credibility, particularly regarding social and environmental policy. The Centre Party's rhetoric is viewed as devalued, and their past actions (the "Green Capital" initiative) are seen as hollow, with critics accusing them of failing to take substantive action.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the simplified taxation act for entrepreneurs and the income tax act, and repealing the security tax act – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the systemic growth of inequality and its consequences, which are pushing Estonia away from the Nordic model and toward a US-style society. He/She criticizes policies that shift the burden of supporting the state onto those "who already have little." Specific political opponents, parties, or the initiators of draft legislation are not criticized by name.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Increasing logging in sacred sites.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.

The primary opponent is the government and the coalition, who are being criticized for prioritizing a technocratic mindset and the raw material demands of the overly large timber industry. The criticism is intense and values-driven, accusing the government of unprecedented plundering and asking if they intend to cut down the churchyards as well.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

This confrontation targets those who favor lengthy, multi-tiered court proceedings, as such preferences impede the accountability of individuals holding monopolistic positions. The criticism itself is procedural, pointing to the opponents' previous assertions regarding fair sentencing, while simultaneously casting doubt on the practical viability of their proposed solutions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
The Minister of Energy and Environment's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the government or ministry, which established the 30% and 70% targets without thorough discussion. The dissent is procedural, highlighting the absence of negotiations and balanced decision-making, and policy-based, as the targets are viewed as substantively empty labels.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Serving a narrow business interest instead of the public interest.

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.

The confrontation is directed against the decision-makers (the government) who are responsible for forming the council and implementing environmental restrictions. The criticism is heavily procedural, emphasizing the risk of a conflict of interest and the unfair exclusion of scientists, environmentalists, and trade unions. Complex legal and logical challenges are presented to the opposing party (e.g., resolving the 70:30 ratio when land use changes).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Inquiry Regarding Electrical Power Generation Capacities (No. 746)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main criticism is aimed at the government's inaction and failed energy policy, particularly concerning public involvement and communication. Minister Kristen Michal is criticized for setting unclear renewable energy targets and providing misleading information regarding Natura area logging. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and the procedural shortcomings.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry Regarding Estonian Environmental Policy (No. 743)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary conflict is with the Ministry of Climate and the minister, who is being criticized for failing to approve the strategic development plan and for untrustworthy engagement. The criticism is particularly sharp regarding the secret and sudden introduction of legislative amendments (e.g., the 30% target), which took place "under the rug, secretly and quietly."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
An inquiry regarding the illegal alteration of the order of protection of natural objects (no. 738)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The criticism targets historical procedural errors that originated in 2004 when mandatory Natura assessments were not carried out. Furthermore, the unexpected changes introduced in 2023 are being criticized, as they placed an incomprehensible and unfair burden on landowners. While the Minister maintains a respectful demeanor in his communications, a solution is demanded to address the consequences of these previous errors.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law amending the Nature Conservation Act, the Hunting Act, and the State Property Act (612 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The primary opposition is directed at the policy of the Ministry of Climate and the provisions of the draft legislation, criticizing political pressure and the centralization of power within the Environmental Board. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, emphasizing that the new provisions grant politicians overly broad powers without legal guidelines. Criticism is also leveled at the former prime minister, who failed to submit the necessary amendments in 2022.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law (610 SE) for amending the Nature Conservation Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (Nature assessment) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

Strong criticism has been leveled against the long-term inaction of the state and politicians (including the former Secretaries General of the Ministry of the Environment), who failed to implement the Natura impact assessment following EU accession. The current draft legislation is being criticized for failing to address the resulting injustice suffered by landowners who have lost all trust in the state. The criticism is primarily procedural and political, stressing that this is damaging the reputation of nature conservation to the point of near-hatred.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Hunting Act (553 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the forestry industry's unsustainable plans and the sections of the Forest Act that encourage excessive logging and ignore green corridors. The opposition is fundamental and policy-driven, focusing on ecological folly and its negative impact on the environment and society.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Unemployment Insurance Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (519 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the proponents of the bill, criticizing their failure to establish specific support or a solution for young people. The criticism is policy- and solution-oriented, focusing on the shortcomings of the social safety net.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Second reading of the bill amending the Hunting Act (553 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at political power games ("sandbox politics") that prevent the adoption of substantive proposals when the speaker belongs to the opposition. He/She argues that the differential treatment of the coalition and the opposition makes addressing important topics unexpectedly complicated and unmanageable.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the future of the ferry connection (no. 739)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

There is too little data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the reorganization of Kehtna Vocational Education Centre and Vana-Vigala Technical and Service School (no 733)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at centralized decision-makers (the government), who stand accused of political short-sightedness and ignoring local realities. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the negative impact of administrative changes (the reorganization of schools) on local communities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry Regarding the Disruption of Railway Construction in Rohuküla (No. 731)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary adversary is the minister, whose political decisions and rationale are being severely criticized. The criticism is rooted in policy and philosophy, accusing the minister of fostering a fatalistic stance regarding rural regions and establishing incorrect priorities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding Rural Areas (no. 713)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is directed at the minister and his party, who are criticized for their fatalistic approach to regional policy. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the absence of a long-term regional policy plan and demanding concrete measures to support small entrepreneurship.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is directed against the minister and the government, who are pushing through an ineffective legislative amendment. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, accusing the opposing side of disregarding consumer interests and suspecting ulterior motives behind the change in law.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-19
Draft law amending the Construction Code Act, the Administrative Cooperation Act, and the Water Act (531 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is directed at the coalition members and their administrative reform proposals, particularly the plans to reduce the number of civil servants by 20% and completely dismantle the Environmental Board. The criticism is intense and philosophical, accusing the opponents of failing to grasp the essence of public authority and engaging in voluntaristic action. The speaker also references the Reform Party's long-standing responsibility for the underfunding of the Environmental Board.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main adversary is the governing coalition, which is being sharply criticized for its shift in environmental policy direction. The criticism is substantive and competence-based, accusing the government of incompetence and inconsistent actions. The proposal by a coalition partner to abolish the Environmental Board is facing particularly fierce criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-26
Draft law amending the Hunting Act (567 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

He reports the Environmental Committee's strong opposition to Bill 567 SE, which was evident in the voting results (7 votes in favor of rejection). The opposition was both substantive and procedural, focusing on the bill's vague terminology, such as "nuisance specimen," and the potential risk of abuse of trust. The Ministry of Climate also voiced its opposition, stating that it did not support the bill in its current form.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-19
Draft law amending the Radiation Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other acts (573 SE) - first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at earlier proponents of the nuclear power plant who claimed that waste storage would be simple and inexpensive. The opposition is policy-driven, focusing on the discrepancy between those claims and the actual cost (150 million euros).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
Draft law amending the Local Government Organisation Act (537 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at irresponsible dog owners, who are considered the true culprits behind dog attacks, rather than the dogs themselves. The current system is also under fire, specifically because local governments have been "quite powerless" in preventing these incidents due to a lack of necessary enforcement authority.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-29
The Ombudsman's proposal to align the law on industrial emissions with the constitution.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the hasty legislative mindset, which is characterized by the phrase, "Let's rush it through now and figure out the consequences later." The opposition is strong and procedural, emphasizing that the quality of the law's content is more important than the quick adoption of the bill itself.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-28
Draft law amending the Hunting Act (553 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The direct opposing party is not personally criticized; instead, focus is placed on highlighting systemic problems within the legal protection framework that hindered a rapid response to the nuisance entities. Furthermore, there is an indirect criticism regarding the lack of capacity to interpret ecological data and logic during decision-making processes, which ultimately led to the situation that developed late last year.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-12
Draft law amending the Construction Code Act, the Act on Administrative Cooperation, and the Water Act (531 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Direct opposition is not voiced, but caution is emphasized regarding the reduction of bureaucracy when it comes to groundwater protection. The criticism is aimed more at potential policy shortcomings and the lack of clarity in the regulatory framework, rather than at specific opponents.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law amending the Waste Act and the Packaging Act (430 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed more at state inertia and systemic issues (e.g., the structure of the retail sector, which relies on plastic) rather than specific political opponents. It criticizes Estonia’s inability to solve significant environmental problems independently, instead waiting for solutions from external sources (the EU). Consumer behavior is also criticized for viewing the avoidance of plastic bags as "buying an indulgence."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Discussion of the nationally significant issue initiated by the Environment Committee: "The Impact of Climate Change on Estonia's Legal Framework and Economy."

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at those who present scientifically unfounded claims or spread inaccurate information (e.g., regarding Brazil leaving the Paris Agreement). Criticism is also aimed at unfair procedural practices that do not allow presenters to respond to accusations. The criticism is intense and emphasizes that such claims are entirely baseless.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The primary critique is aimed at the framework of the government's policy, which treats the economy in isolation, allowing environmental and social needs to be given insufficient weight. The speaker sharply rejects notions that underestimate the risks of aggression toward Estonia, referring to them as "fairy tales."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

Criticism is directed against the church branch associated with Russia, which is viewed as a potential security threat and a weapon in the conflict. The opposition is intense and political, focusing on preventing the institution from misusing its power in the interest of national security.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other laws thereof (505 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the bill introduced by the government and its rapporteur, criticizing the arbitrary reallocation of political instruments. The criticism is policy-driven, stressing that the proposed solution fails to guarantee the effectiveness of regional policy. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; instead, comprehensive explanations are being demanded.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-18
Second reading of the Draft Act (359 SE) on amendments to the Law on the Organization of the Energy Economy, the Electricity Market Act, and the Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Act

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the political choices made by the drafters of the bill and the inconsistencies within the text of the law, rather than at specific political opponents. The opposition is policy-based, highlighting the strange disparity in conservation measures between the plant kingdom and the animal kingdom.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The criticism targets the flawed legislative practice of introducing conceptual amendments under the guise of simple statutory changes. The objection is procedural and moderate in intensity, framed as a question rather than a direct attack against a specific political opponent.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The criticism is primarily aimed at procedural deficiencies within the Environment Committee, specifically accusing the rapporteur (Igor Taro) of disregarding the substantive conditionality of the proposed amendments and failing to consult adequately with the Social Democrats. There is also sharp criticism directed at the influence of lobbying and major interests on energy decisions, as well as "businessmen" whose profitability may not ultimately benefit the state or the taxpayer.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-11
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (455 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Recall of a Member of the Supervisory Board of the Environmental Investments Centre Foundation and Appointment of a New Member"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

There is no opposition; the speaker emphasizes that there was complete consensus within the commission and that virtually no substantive discussion took place. There is no criticism, neither from political opponents nor regarding the procedures.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-11
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of a Member of the Supervisory Board of the State Forest Management Centre" (454 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

There is absolutely no opposition, as the speaker repeatedly stresses that all procedural decisions—including the appointment of the new member and the introduction of the draft bill—were made by consensus within the committee. The only comment highlighted (from Rain Epler) was a rather positive observation concerning the rotation of membership.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the government as a whole, warning that unless regional and mobility policies are swiftly altered, the car tax will remain nothing more than a means of filling the state coffers. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on the danger that the law's objectives will not be met.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Criticism is directed at the draft bill's rapporteur and the government, which is seeking the mandate to develop the legislation. The opposition targets both procedural shortcomings (incorrect timing and lack of analyses) and political claims (the question of nuclear energy's cost-effectiveness and controllability). The intensity of the criticism is moderate, focusing on exposing inconsistencies.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Climate on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Criticism is directed at the political direction of the Ministry of Climate, which appears to prioritize economic stability over broader environmental preservation. The opposition is policy-based, criticizing the renaming of the law, the sloganistic nature of the objectives, and the omission of crucial issues (such as the poor water quality of the Baltic Sea). The exclusion of people and the community from the central focus is particularly strongly criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-18
Discussion of the matter of significant national importance, initiated by the Environmental Committee, titled "The necessity and possibilities of introducing nuclear energy in Estonia"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

Criticism is aimed at nuclear energy lobby organizations that distort the information space and commission vague surveys to generate emotional support. The opposition is directed primarily at procedural bias and the absence of a rational decision-making process. Specific political opponents are not named; rather, the influence of the lobbying is criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-11
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue: "How to Ensure the Future of Veterinary Medicine"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is focused more on unrealistic assumptions and past political shortcomings rather than specific individuals. One speaker offered a measured critique of the position that agriculture is always beneficial to biodiversity, pointing out environmental issues like pollution and the decline of open-country bird populations. There was also an indirect reference to earlier policies that resulted in the underfunding of the Estonian University of Life Sciences (Maaülikool).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-09
Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism targets the deficiencies of the government's ambitious economic plan (the implementation of "Estonia 2035"), particularly concerning how environmental impact is accounted for. This opposition is substantive and policy-driven, calling into question the overall integrity of the plan from an environmental perspective.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
Second Reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Electronic Communications Act and the Nature Conservation Act (392 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The standoff is directed at the procedural structure of the draft bill, criticizing the bundling of urgent and non-urgent topics within the framework of emergency proceedings. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the quality of lawmaking rather than on individuals or political alignment. The criticism proved justified, as the Government's opinion confirmed the existence of shortcomings.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-20
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amending the Atmospheric Air Protection Act (393 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

Not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-12
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Electronic Communications Act and the Nature Conservation Act (392 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting

Direct opponents are not named, but the criticism is aimed at those who initiated the emergency proceedings for the draft bill, questioning the necessity of rushing the process concerning three specific nature conservation provisions. The criticism is procedural and cautious, not aggressive, and focuses on potential risks and improper procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
First reading of the Bill (359 SE) for the Act supplementing the Act on the Organization of the Energy Sector and the Act on Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the drafters of the bill, focusing on inaccuracies or logical flaws within the policy and legal text, rather than being a personal attack. The opposition is directed at the inconsistency of a specific provision of the bill, not the bill in its entirety.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-08
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "On the Special Labeling and Sale of Insects and Insect-Containing Foods and Products" (222 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The confrontation is aimed at the initiators of the draft bill, who justify the special labeling of insect protein flour based on cultural unfamiliarity and potential health risks. The criticism is politically motivated and focuses on the weakness of the foundation underlying the opposing side's arguments, demanding proof for these claims.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-25
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Atmospheric Air Protection Act (160 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the inadequacy of the information presented by the speaker, as the exact percentage or proportion of the fuel additives was left unmentioned. The speaker questions the sufficiency of the presenter's claims, asking whether the data provided is adequate to cause the mentioned environmental impact. The objection is purely data-based and aimed at clarifying the information.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Water Act (346 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

There is no direct confrontation with specific political opponents. The criticism is aimed at the existing system and historical practices (drainage and water diversion) that fail to consider the context of the climate crisis and resource sustainability. He/She criticizes the previous mindset where used water was discharged into the recipient body and essentially forgotten about.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (104 OE), titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Remove the So-Called Bronze Soldier Statue from Public Space"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the arguments put forth by the bill's supporters, particularly their stance linking the strength of national identity to the removal of the monument. The criticism targets the political justification, not the personal level.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling