By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

Insufficient data.

The speaker refers to colleagues' positions to support their arguments regarding the overproduction and lack of planning for onshore wind farms. Towards the coalition, however, the style is oppositional, highlighting the hypocritical attitude of coalition members concerning the cost of cabling high-voltage lines in Harju County versus Saare County.

The speaker mentions cooperating with a colleague ("I'm going to help Lauri out a bit"), which points to a supportive relationship within their political faction. There is no evidence of cross-party compromise or cooperation.

The style of cooperation relies heavily on the proposals put forward by business organizations (such as the Chamber of Commerce and Industry) and professional associations (such as the Chamber of Auditors), utilizing these proposals to validate its own standpoints. The speaker is collaborating with fellow faction member Evelin Poolamets and is speaking on behalf of Isamaa, but highlights the failure to achieve a compromise with the ministry.

The speaker is participating in an active debate, referencing the positions of colleagues (Seeder, Laats) and stressing the avoidance of categorization (left-, right-, or center-populism). He supports sending the Centre Party's draft bill forward to the second reading, demonstrating a willingness for procedural cooperation in continuing the discussion.

The speaker emphasizes cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce and Industry (representing entrepreneurs) and the Estonian Chamber of Auditors, praising the latter for its readiness to compromise (the raising of the 25% + 20% limits). He confirms complete intra-factional (Isamaa) unity regarding his positions, but criticizes the government side for its lack of willingness to compromise.

Insufficient data.

Data indicating a cooperative style is absent; the speaker acts as a critical interrogator, calling into question both the content of the draft bill and the work of other deputies. There is no reference to seeking compromises or cross-party cooperation.

Not enough data

There is no information regarding cooperation with the government; instead, the situation is characterized by sharp confrontation. The earlier question raised by a colleague (Andres Metsoja) on the same topic is noted, which suggests a certain level of information exchange and coordination with other opposition members.

The style of cooperation is direct and dialogic, addressing a specific colleague ("Dear Eero!") by name and attempting to identify a shared concern. The speaker stresses that this is a common problem ("for the sake of our children and yours as well"), which indicates a desire to find a cross-party solution.

The speaker supports the idea put forward by other parties regarding state regulation of the windfall profits banks have made thanks to Euribor, demonstrating openness on specific issues. However, he/she stresses that the government is listening neither to businesses nor the opposition, which points to a current lack of cooperation with the government.