By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

Although the speaker represents the opposition (Isamaa) and criticizes the government, he calls on everyone to forget partisan squabbles and vote in favor of Isamaa's draft bill, stressing that the outcome and finding consensus are what truly matter. He demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, provided that such cooperation leads to a reduction in bureaucracy.

Data regarding willingness to cooperate or compromise with other political forces is lacking, as the speeches focus on directly challenging the minister. The pattern of activity rather points toward an oppositional oversight function.

Cooperates with the opposition, praising Rain Epler (EKRE) for a good and intelligent overview, and supporting EKRE's bill to request the abandonment of CO2 quotas. Initiates the formation of a Parliamentary investigative committee to scrutinize the actions of the executive branch. Shows no openness to compromise with the coalition.

The speaker refers to the second half of the question posed by their benchmate, which demonstrates coordinated action within their political group. They invite the Prime Minister to visit the Saaremaa sheep collective, offering the "good wisdom" gained there for improving state governance, which constitutes a potential offer for practical cooperation.

Data is scarce.

Cooperation is demonstrated with local governments, referencing the appeal of the Hiiumaa Municipal Council and using it to support their arguments. This shows a readiness to work with regional stakeholders. Data regarding other inter-party cooperation is unavailable.

Insufficient data