By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The speaker's main legislative priority is reducing bureaucracy by supporting the draft amendment to the Accounting Act (600 SE), which aims to postpone the sustainability reporting obligation or make it voluntary. He acts as both the initiator and a supporter, stressing that Isamaa raised these issues early on.

The focus is on opposing the government's planned education reform and highlighting its negative consequences. The speaker is acting as an opponent of the existing policy, rather than an initiator of new legislation. Information regarding specific legislative priorities is lacking.

The main legislative focus is on government oversight and changing energy policy. It supports EKRE's draft bill aimed at eliminating CO2 quotas and will initiate the formation of a Riigikogu (Parliamentary) investigative committee to look into the circumstances surrounding the subsidization of offshore wind farm construction.

The legislative focus is on challenging the regulation issued by the Minister of Education concerning the start time of the school day. The speaker is clearly opposed to the initiative, viewing it as unnecessary bureaucracy and counterproductive busywork that only creates problems.

The primary legislative focus is the opposition to the draft bill, which proposes introducing an island mode operational fee to secure 1000 MW of controllable reserve capacity. The speaker (representing Isamaa) is a strong opponent of this bill, arguing that it creates a new tax burden for consumers.

The legislative focus is directed towards accelerating the procurement of new ferries (the fifth vessel) and making its requirements (e.g., hydrogen/electric power) more realistic to ensure the sustainability of the service. Equally important is the regulation of ticket prices and the involvement of local governments in the pricing structure, aimed at preventing unilateral price increases.

The primary legislative focus is aimed at reducing bureaucracy and reshaping energy policy to support economic competitiveness. The speaker is a strong opponent of the current administrative and energy policy direction.