By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The speaker positions himself against excessive bureaucracy and the European Union's "green frenzy," which, in his estimation, is destroying the economy's competitiveness. He stresses the need to focus on a "development plan for competition-resilient energy policy" rather than a climate-based development plan. The political focus is heavily directed toward protecting the business environment and criticizing regulations.

The speaker strongly opposes the government's plan for restructuring vocational education in Hiiumaa, particularly the elimination of the tuition-free horticulture specialty, which will lead to the school's eventual decline. The political position is outcome-based, emphasizing negative consequences such as job losses, student attrition, and the loss of function of Suuremõisa Manor. This stance is strongly oppositional to the minister's claims that schools will not be eliminated.

Strong opposition to the climate and energy policies of the government and the European Union, which are viewed as economically damaging "climate hysteria" and "madness." It supports traditional family values and opposes gender quotas in publicly listed companies, stressing economic competitiveness and national sustainability. The political framework is value-based, focusing critically on the impact of the government’s long-term poor decisions.

The speaker strongly opposes the Minister of Education’s draft regulation concerning changes to the start time of the school day, branding it as mere busywork that only generates bureaucracy. The political focus is centered on highlighting the inefficiency of the government’s actions and the practical problems this will create for rural communities. The stance is highly confrontational and outcome-oriented, concentrating specifically on the logistical consequences.

The political focus is on energy policy and the tax burden. The speaker strongly opposes the government’s green transition strategy, labeling it senseless policy and "green lunacy," which has resulted in Estonia having the most expensive electricity in Europe. He is firmly against imposing new taxes on consumers, such as the island operation fee, stressing that this is yet another tax burden. The stance is strongly oppositional and results-oriented, criticizing the government’s failure to secure competitive energy prices.

The political stance focuses on strong criticism regarding the poor organization of ferry traffic and constantly rising ticket prices. The politician urgently demands measures to improve the situation of island residents, emphasizing that the ferry connection is an extension of the highway, and warns that high prices endanger life on the islands. The criticism is directed both at the service provider's profitability and the government's inability to ensure a reliable connection and a new fleet.

The political position strongly advocates for cutting bureaucracy and opposes the actions of the government that defends the civil service. The speaker stresses the link between state sustainability, economic competitiveness, and demographic issues (specifically, the shrinking tax base). Criticism is also leveled at utopian green policies that fail to acknowledge economic reality.