By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The main criticism is aimed at the government and the coalition, particularly concerning the budgetary uncertainty within the education sector. The Social Democrats and Jevgeni Ossinovski are directly criticized for failing to deliver on their promises and for their inconsistency, stressing the need to look for solutions in the future, not the past. The criticism targets the inefficiency of the government's actions and its failure to fulfill commitments.

The main criticism is directed at the Government of the Republic as a whole, citing the failure to fulfill promises, the lack of unified responsibility, and the slow pace of negotiations. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, demanding the collective responsibility of the government and that the issue be brought under the direct leadership of the head of government. The government's inaction is described as "disappointment" and "deception."

Direct political opponents are not criticized, but concern is expressed regarding pointless duplication and the resulting financial burden on the state, specifically referencing the Ida-Virumaa film campus. The criticism is instead aimed at the potential side effects of the draft bill and the lack of future funding allocated for the seventh and eighth projects.