By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The primary criticism targets the government’s handling of research funding distribution and the slow pace of processing the draft law concerning the organization of R&D. This criticism is policy-driven, stressing that the current funding model (40:40:20) is detrimental to national research institutions and universities, as it channels funds into projects with potentially weaker quality control. Furthermore, the practice of financing service contracts at the expense of core research funding is also under fire.

The primary opposition is aimed at the government, which is being criticized over the threat of a teachers' strike and the unfair models used to fund the education system. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, demanding specific corrective actions from the government and accusing them of delaying the implementation of support measures.

The main opponents are Martin Helme (EKRE), who is criticized for making false claims and being absent from a crucial vote, and the prime minister, who is accused of breaking promises made in the coalition agreement and failing to address strike prevention. Criticism directed at the government is intense and focuses on the political failure to secure funding necessary to fulfill their commitments.

The main opponent is the current government, which is directly blamed for causing the teachers' strike and pushing society to the brink of stress. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the government's failure to adopt a "tangible solution" during wage negotiations. The government's actions are described as undermining the foundations of the state.

Insufficient data.

The primary opposition is aimed at the government coalition, which is being criticized for its inability to find 10 million euros for teachers' salary increases and to prevent the strike. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of failing to fulfill its promises and the Ministry of Education of adopting a rigid legalistic approach. Also criticized are "education gurus" who advocate for shrinking the school network in order to find money.