By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

Total Sessions: 6

Fully Profiled: 6

2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Acknowledges previous agreements (e.g., with Kristjan Järvan regarding the financing of service contracts) and calls upon the current government to adhere to them. Sees the need to establish international regional scientific cooperation within the European Union, prioritizing collaboration with Finland, Latvia, and Lithuania due to the security situation.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The cooperation model emphasizes the need for the state and local governments to find joint solutions, especially when supporting schools in sparsely populated areas, as local governments may not possess sufficient educational expertise. The speaker calls upon the government to work with local municipalities to sew tailor-made suits.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker stresses the necessity for a concerted effort and commitment from the government in securing funds, particularly concerning teachers' wages. They indicate that this responsibility should fall to the entire cabinet, not solely the Minister of Education. This suggests a preference for broad-based fiscal accountability across the government.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker positively referenced the previous government coalition's ability to make political decisions. They stress that the current government must reach an agreement with the teachers, who have offered compromise proposals, demonstrating that cooperation with stakeholders is a prerequisite for the success of the reform.
2024-01-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is respectful and questioning, focused on obtaining information from the presenter during the Riigikogu session. There is no information regarding wider coalitions or compromises.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker calls for internal government cooperation, demanding assistance from other ministries for the Minister of Education in securing the necessary missing funding. The President’s statesmanlike role during the visit to Metsküla school is positively assessed, indicating support for a conciliatory and measured approach. However, it is simultaneously noted that the President’s peace offering has seemingly not been accepted.