By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The political position is centered on the discussion and approval of specific fiscal measures, such as the payroll tax. The speaker employs short, direct affirmations ("Exactly!") and references facts concerning the implementation of the policy. The position is primarily policy-based, focusing on the factual confirmation of tax revenue collection.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the proposed amendments to the law implementing the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy, particularly the introduction of social conditionality. The criticism centers on the increased administrative burden placed on applicants and the creation of an unequal situation among producers, given that sanctions are applied only to operators who undergo inspection. This position is clearly policy- and performance-driven, culminating in a proposal to reject the draft legislation.

The political stance is firmly opposed to centralization, particularly regarding the closure of regional courthouses. The speaker stresses the importance of the principle of regionality and maintaining public confidence, further linking the issue to national security policy significance. This position is primarily shaped by a value-based approach that prioritizes the symbolic significance of maintaining a local presence.

The political position is strongly protective of entrepreneurship and economic continuity, opposing regulations that restrict investments and undermine regulatory stability. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's draft legislation, particularly the amendments to the Subsoil Act, which halt proceedings and disregard socio-economic impacts. The position is value-based, emphasizing the protection of the legitimate expectation of entrepreneurs and highlighting constitutional conflicts. The Estonian Conservative People's Party does not support this amendment.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the construction of wind farms near border areas, especially if they compromise national defense capabilities and intelligence operations. The speaker sharply criticizes the 2022 decision by Kaja Kallas’s government to greenlight the Aidu wind farm, viewing it as increasing the security threat. The primary focus is on ensuring national defense and security, prioritizing them over development activities. This position is strongly value-driven and critical of the government's actions.

The speaker represents a strong opposition stance, opposing the bills initiated by the Reform Party-led government, particularly the education reform and the new security tax. The political framework is primarily procedural and results-oriented, highlighting deficiencies in the legislative process (the absence of impact assessments) and the negative impact on entrepreneurship and regional development. The Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE) does not support the draft Education Act.

The political position is strongly opposed to the draft bill presented by the Social Affairs Committee, which concerns amendments to the Child Protection Act and the Criminal Records Act. This stance is value-based, emphasizing the necessity of protecting Estonian children from pedophiles and preventing potential loopholes created by the proposed legislation. The speaker positions their party (EKRE) as the only one standing up for the interests of children.

The political stance is sharply critical of the government's handling of state assets (the lands of Tartu Agro), highlighting the sluggishness and lack of transparency in the decision-making process. The focus is on administrative inefficiency and its negative effect on farming businesses. The speaker is demanding that the minister take quicker action and provide a clear schedule to prevent social tensions and financial damage to entrepreneurs.