By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The political position is strongly oppositional, criticizing the speed of the government's legislative work and the procedural disregard, which is referred to as the "steamroller." It is emphasized that the change of minister has not brought a new approach. The main objections concern the lack of impact assessments and the haste—justified by the budget strategy—in raising fine rates and state fees.

The political position focuses on two main areas: the critical assessment of financial and green regulations at the European Union level, and social concern over the increasing number of abortions without medical indication. The speaker prefers economic revitalization over additional green rules and demands active state action in raising awareness of the value of new life. The standpoints are value-based, especially concerning social issues.

The political position is strongly opposed to the expansion of e-voting and m-voting, stressing the system's lack of security and the widespread distrust among voters. The primary focus is on value-based criticism regarding the secrecy, transparency, and reliability of elections, asserting that the system is "controlled from within." The speaker argues that the distrust of 40% of voters should be setting off alarm bells, but the government is ignoring this danger.

The politician supports the government-initiated draft bill 377 SE, which addresses working while on sick leave and the transposition of the occupational safety directive, viewing it as the correct step forward. However, he sharply criticizes the government's regional policy, particularly the centralizing effect of the public library reform and the resulting job losses in county centers. His political framework is policy-driven, focusing on the specifics of legislation and ensuring regional sustainability.

The political position is aimed at criticizing the government's actions and funding, particularly in the infrastructure sector. There is a demand that the state redirect the extra revenue generated by the hike in VAT and excise taxes to local municipalities for road maintenance. Additionally, the need to clarify historical facts concerning national defense is stressed, specifically criticizing the Reform Party's earlier opposition to mandatory military service.

The central theme revolves around the chronic underfunding of veterinary education—a shortfall of 2 million euros—and the direct link this has to both Estonian food security and national security. The speaker strongly advocates for the viability of rural life and the agricultural sector, contrasting this stance with the government's alleged "green frenzy" and its reliance on management driven solely by Excel spreadsheets. This position is deeply value-based, stressing the importance of self-sufficiency levels and the strategic necessity of preserving rural regions. On a political note, there is sharp criticism directed at a ruling party member's assertion that living in the countryside is environmentally harmful.

The political position is strongly focused on increasing the efficiency of road transport, supporting the allowance of longer and heavier truck combinations (road trains with greater gross vehicle weight) through amendments to the Traffic Act. Criticism is directed at the government’s current economic policies, especially the increases in fuel excise duty and road usage fees imposed under the pretext of the green transition, which are considered detrimental to the business environment. The political framework is clearly results- and policy-based, emphasizing cost-effectiveness and competitiveness.

The most prominent issue is the motor vehicle tax, which the speaker strongly opposes. This opposition focuses both on ethical concerns (the minister's unlawful conduct) and the legislative deadlock caused by the lack of European Union approval. The criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy and the personal example set by its proponent, thereby calling the government's trustworthiness into question. There is a strong emphasis on performance-based criticism, highlighting hypocritical behavior.

The political position is highly critical of the government's budget priorities, particularly concerning the costly income tax reform, which is viewed merely as the fulfillment of an election promise. The speaker stresses the necessity of supporting large families and protecting the education network, especially opposing the closure of high schools in Ida-Viru County. The overall stance is primarily policy- and results-driven, demanding concrete actions.

The political position is focused on the internal organization of the Riigikogu and the pursuit of office. The speaker affirms strong support for their candidacy for the Deputy Speaker position, which is a procedural and office-oriented framework.

The political focus is heavily centered on national defense, bolstering border security, and education policy, particularly in relation to Ukrainian war refugees. The speaker stresses the necessity of finalizing earlier initiatives, specifically the militarized border defense, and criticizes the current lack of data concerning specialists residing within the country. Regarding educational matters, he advocates for native language instruction, considering it crucial for supporting Ukrainian resistance. He also highlights the role played by his party (EKRE) in previous security decision-making.

The political platform is strongly focused on supporting the agricultural sector and cutting red tape. The most pressing issues are the complexity of tracking working hours, which is a major headache for producers, and the ban on goose hunting, which is threatening winter crop yields. The speaker urgently calls for simplification in the process of applying for 2024 subsidies to ease the constant stress and anxiety faced by farmers.

The political focus is directed toward the implementation of food safety and regulatory standards, particularly concerning the treatment of foodstuffs with ionizing radiation. Detailed questions are being raised regarding the clarification of existing market conditions and laboratory accreditation standards, which points to an implementation-focused approach to policy. The overall stance is primarily policy-driven and consumer protection-oriented.

The speaker holds a strongly value-based and nationalistic political position, stressing the prioritization of Estonian citizens in both labor policy and the provision of foreign aid. He calls for public involvement in crucial social issues, specifically criticizing the failure to hold a referendum on the redefinition of marriage. This political stance is characterized by sharp criticism directed at the government's actions and procedural decisions.