By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and ministers, particularly concerning the fast-tracking of draft legislation without due analysis. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, accusing the government of continuing its "steamroller" tactics and ignoring feedback provided in the coordination tables.

The opposing side is primarily criticized for failing to answer the questions raised in the inquiry (especially concerning social programs) and for misrepresenting the views of a colleague (Martin Helme). At the European level, the speaker is seeking disagreement and opposition (e.g., Poland, Hungary, Slovakia) to the introduction of green rules, indicating a desire to put the brakes on these regulations.

Strong criticism has been leveled against the government and the coalition, who are accused of ignoring the views of the 40% of people who distrust e-voting and of imposing an insecure system. Criticism is also aimed at the Constitutional Committee's subjective decision to bundle the proposed amendments together and at the pressuring of the Republic Electoral Committee to address the verification of insecure elections.

The criticism targets the government's regional policy, specifically faulting the centralization achieved through the public libraries reform, which results in jobs moving from county centers to the capital. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the lack of regional sustainability and the deterioration of local services.

The confrontation is aimed at the justifications for the government's (or minister's) actions and funding, which are deemed insufficient or ineffective. Particularly sharp criticism is leveled against the Reform Party's historical stance on national defense, accusing them of campaigning to abolish conscription—an attack based on factual accuracy.

The main targets of criticism are the government (which cannot secure additional funding) and the Ministry of Education and Research, which shows no interest in veterinary studies. The criticism is policy- and procedure-driven, accusing the government of "green hysteria" and managing the country based on an Excel spreadsheet, thereby ignoring the sector's needs. Separate opposition is directed at the stance of a ruling party member who considers living in the countryside detrimental to the environment.

The primary criticism is aimed at the current government, which is accused of implementing economy-stifling taxes (such as fuel excise duty and road usage fees) under the guise of the "green transition." Critics oppose the government’s environmental policy, arguing that it actually increases the environmental footprint by forcing haulers to use multiple vehicles to transport the same volume of goods. The criticism is policy-driven and intense.

The main confrontation is directed against the minister and the proponents of the motor vehicle tax. The criticism is intense and encompasses both personal unethical conduct (driving with an expired technical inspection) and legislative and legal issues (procedural delays, inequality in the EU context). The opponent's behavior is directly labeled as illegal.

The speaker is clearly taking an opposition stance, criticizing the government over budget deficits and the prioritization of income tax reform. The criticism is policy- and financing-based, contrasting the government's new taxes (a motor vehicle tax) with the opposition's alternative (a bank tax).

Insufficient data

The criticism is aimed at the government’s inaction or inefficiency, particularly concerning its failure to finalize policies and its lack of awareness regarding the professional backgrounds of people residing in the country. The critic also takes aim at the demands made by certain interest groups (such as Muslim/Jewish schools), dismissing them as pseudo-issues that divert attention away from providing aid to Ukraine. Furthermore, the lack of inter-ministerial consultation during the drafting of legislation is also criticized.

The criticism is aimed at the government and agencies (the Labour Inspectorate, PRIA) which impose bureaucratic requirements that make agriculture inefficient and ignore practical needs. A separate conflict has arisen with ornithologists, whose successful hunting ban has led to the failure of winter crops, despite the increase in the goose population.

There is no criticism or opposition; questions are directed to the Minister to obtain information and clarification regarding the regulatory changes. Neither opponents nor policies are being attacked; instead, the focus is on understanding the details of the law's implementation.

Criticism is aimed both at the Riigikogu Board for procedural deficiencies and at government ministers who wish to import labor from outside Estonia. The speaker criticizes the respondents for their vague answers and lack of awareness, while simultaneously rejecting the accusation that EKRE is not helping Ukraine. He expresses strong opposition to circumventing a referendum on the marriage issue.