By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The speeches reveal no willingness to cooperate or any indication of cross-party activity. The tone is purely oppositional and questioning, focusing on demanding accountability and explanations from the presenters and ministers.

The speaker demonstrates cooperation within their faction by approvingly referencing the statistical comparison method introduced by a colleague (Jaak Valge) for analyzing abortions. Collaboration with other parties is not directly evident from the speeches, as the focus is on expressing opposition and posing questions.

The style of cooperation is predominantly oppositional towards the ruling coalition and the rapporteurs of the draft bill. The speaker bases their argumentation on the risks presented in the harmonization table of the Republic's Electoral Commission (RVK) and demands that the RVK's proposals be taken into account.

The speaker supports the government-initiated bill, which demonstrates a willingness to back policies that he/she deems appropriate. He/She mentions that the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of the Interior are consulting on proposals put forward by bankruptcy trustees and bailiffs, signaling a readiness for inter-ministerial coordination regarding future legislation.

Not enough data

The speaker expresses appreciation to the Rural Affairs Committee and to those who introduced this topic to the floor, as well as to the sector-specific organizations (the Chamber of Veterinarians, the Chamber of Agriculture and Commerce, and the University of Life Sciences). The continuing education solution developed by the Estonian University of Life Sciences using its own resources is particularly commended, as it helps former veterinarians return to the sector. This cooperation is focused on finding solutions together with the sector and with politicians who grasp the issue.

The speaker presents a proposal on behalf of the Estonian Conservative People's Party (EKRE), thereby indicating strong cooperation based within the faction. The previous stances of a colleague (Rene Kokk) are also referenced, which demonstrates internal coordination. Cross-party or compromise-oriented cooperation is absent.

Insufficient data

It refers to the Estonian Conservative People's Party's (EKRE) earlier proposal regarding the bank tax, demonstrating internal party consensus. It also references a colleague's view ("just as Moonika said"), confirming the existence of communication within the opposition.

Insufficient data

Cooperation with other parties is not mentioned, but the speaker refers approvingly to his colleague Ants, continuing the topic he raised. The primary mode of interaction is the detailed questioning of the presenter and the highlighting of procedural errors.

The speaker references the issue of working hours raised by a colleague (Andres), which indicates cooperation within their own faction on specific topics. However, there is no evidence of cross-party compromise or broad-based collaboration.

The speaker refers to cooperation with colleagues (referencing the "benchmate issue"), demonstrating a willingness to support topics initiated by others. Communication with the minister is courteous and centered on the exchange of information, suggesting an openness to constructive dialogue.

The speeches contain no reference to cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other political parties. The speaker instead represents and defends the positions of their own party (EKRE), demanding clear political plans and answers from the opposing side.