By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller
Total Sessions: 141
Fully Profiled: 141
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
No data available.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Insufficient information.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speeches reveal no willingness to cooperate or seek compromise; on the contrary, the speaker represents the faction's clear and strong opposition to the bill. There are no references to bilateral or cross-factional cooperation.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Not enough data
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of cooperation between beekeepers and crop growers, noting that the previous PRIA registration system facilitated this communication when planning plant protection work. He hopes for future improvements to the regulations so that all beekeepers can receive support.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The style of cooperation is intra-factional, with the query being submitted on behalf of nine members of the Estonian Conservative People's Party faction. There is no information regarding inter-party cooperation or readiness for compromise.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The cooperation style focuses on the necessity of learning from the success stories of our neighbors (Lithuania and Latvia) in order to boost Estonia's competitiveness. The speaker directly asks what exactly we can learn from the Latvians and Lithuanians, specifically pointing to Lithuania's success in avoiding the mistakes Estonia made. There is no data available regarding internal cooperation between political parties.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The style of cooperation demonstrates the unity of the intra-factional opposition, as the speaker aligns themselves with the rejection statement issued by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party. There is no reference to cross-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data. (The discourse is purely oppositional and accusatory; there are no signs pointing toward cooperation.)
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is no sign of cooperation; the discourse is rather confrontational and critical. Although the proposal is rhetorically framed as coming to the government's aid, the actual goal is sharp criticism of the government's policy and the offering of opposing solutions. No willingness to compromise is expressed.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The style of cooperation is demonstrated by supporting and referencing the positions of other colleagues (such as Martin Helme) regarding tax policy and support for businesses. There are no indications of a willingness to compromise with the government; instead, the government's responsibility is highlighted.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Cooperation is seen as a possible strategy at the international level, recommending the inclusion of neighbors when seeking a CO2 exemption due to the security situation. Domestically, the style is rather questioning and confrontational, demanding explanations and accountability from coalition representatives.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
No data available
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker supports broad cooperation within the administrative council, stressing the need to involve all political parties represented in parliament. At the same time, he/she criticizes the current situation where the political will for such broad-based cooperation is lacking.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker expresses readiness to cooperate with the coalition on tax cuts, labeling this move a "concession" and a "helping hand." However, the topic of cooperation is simultaneously being used rhetorically to draw attention to the coalition's previous inability to act jointly and reduce taxes. This cooperation is specifically aimed at supporting concrete tax legislation.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The cooperative approach demonstrates a willingness to work alongside other opposition parties, citing the cancellation of the Jõhvi courthouse decision as an example after the opposition collectively brought the issue to light. There is no direct collaboration with the government; the primary focus remains on criticizing and scrutinizing the government's activities.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is highly supportive and cooperative regarding the presenter's proposal ("We definitely support this"). They appreciate the presentation of the various viewpoints (the doctor's, the environmental perspective, and the energy specialist's) and pose a question about the scope of future activities, demonstrating a readiness to work toward a shared objective.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The cooperation style is an open dialogue with the minister, conducted through questions and answers, with the goal of obtaining clarifications on the details of the draft law and ensuring its quality. This style is more supervisory than compromise-seeking.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
There is not enough data.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is actively promoting cooperation within the opposition, noting that the Centre Party (Keskerakond), EKRE, and Isamaa all support lowering the VAT. Help and support are being offered to the coalition to implement this joint initiative, demonstrating an openness to political compromise on the issue of tax reduction. The goal of this cooperation is to "do good for the Estonian people."
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The data points to earlier isolation (EKRE was the only party that did not support the 2022 change), demonstrating a readiness to stick to their positions. However, strong support is being expressed for the current draft decision, indicating a willingness to back necessary amendments and advancements.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is not enough data.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
No data available.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
There is no information regarding cooperation, compromises, or cross-party activity. The speaker acts as a critical questioner.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is seemingly respectful and adheres to procedural rules, with participants respectfully addressing the chair of the session. There is no information regarding inter-party cooperation or a readiness to compromise.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker expresses preliminary support for the draft bill but immediately proposes a significant amendment: the withdrawal of solar energy subsidies. This signals a readiness for cooperation, which is nonetheless conditional upon expanding the bill's regulatory scope and achieving a greater reliance on market principles.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The collaborative style is open and procedural, respectfully engaging with the presenters and acknowledging the broader discussion that took place in the committee. The aim is to gain clarity and additional information, not to be confrontational.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker cites his colleagues (Siim Pohlak, Mart Helme) in support of the demographic data, suggesting cooperation within his political faction. There is no evidence of cross-party compromise or collaboration.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker noted the presence of EKRE and the Centre Party in the chamber, indirectly referencing their shared opposition stance and potential collaboration in the no-confidence procedure. Direct cooperation with other parties was not described.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
The speaker references and relies upon the questions posed by Mart Helme, returning to those points at the conclusion of his address, which suggests a degree of substantive cooperation with his colleague. There is no information regarding any willingness to cooperate with the ruling coalition parties.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker calls upon the coalition and all parliamentary parties to support the alternative proposal put forth by 23 Riigikogu members, which would restrict voting rights in local elections to Estonian and EU citizens. This demonstrates a willingness to cooperate toward a specific legislative objective aimed at valuing citizenship.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker commends and thanks their colleague (Tanel) for bringing the topic to the Riigikogu chamber, showing support for the substance of the issue despite the colleague being a member of the coalition. He/She offers concrete political solutions (e.g., lowering the minimum funding threshold for coaches), which indicates a readiness to contribute to improving the system.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no data available regarding the cooperation style, as this is an official question addressed to the minister during a plenary session.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
There is no information regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise; the discourse is purely adversarial and focuses on challenging the opposing party's arguments and motives.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Lack of data
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The records indicate communication with the minister by raising questions and concerns, seeking clarifications and assurances. There is no evidence of cooperation with colleagues or other political parties.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Cooperation is evident within the faction itself, as the final proposal is submitted on behalf of the Estonian Conservative People's Party faction. Furthermore, a colleague's (Rain Epler) previous position is referenced to support the argument concerning the Labour Inspectorate's inspection focus. There is no data available regarding inter-party cooperation or willingness to compromise.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker builds upon a question posed by their colleague (Rene Kokk), demonstrating cooperation within their own faction while continuing and deepening the subject he initiated. However, the attitude towards the coalition and the commission is demanding and confrontational, focusing on demanding accountability and criticizing the lack of transparency.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
In terms of cooperation, the speaker adopts a rather confrontational stance toward the minister, yet simultaneously signals the local government's willingness to support the continued existence of the Jõhvi courthouse. The call to the minister is to secure the necessary resources and initiate negotiations with the developer to achieve a sensible agreement—a move that suggests a genuine desire to find a solution rather than merely offering criticism.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker exhibits strong agreement and cooperation, using the confirming phrase "Exactly!". There are no references to cross-party compromise, but there is a readiness to support the views of others.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
No data is available. The speaker raises critical questions and proposes rejection on behalf of the faction, but makes no mention of a willingness to cooperate or seek compromises with other parties.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates internal cooperation within the faction or the party, continuing the issue brought up by colleague Riina Solman. Openness to compromise or inter-party cooperation is not mentioned in this speech.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
Not enough data
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker concurs with colleague Tõnis Lukas concerning the hidden aspects of the education bill’s content, which demonstrates a selective acknowledgement of the arguments presented by other colleagues. Direct references to broader cross-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise are absent, given that the bill is being rejected in its entirety.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Cooperation is evident with party colleagues (the Conservative People's Party of Estonia and Riina Solman), who submitted amendments aimed at improving the draft bill. There is a lack of willingness to cooperate with the coalition, as the speaker criticizes their refusal to consider the proposed amendments.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker stresses the crucial importance of being willing to compromise, pointing out that the initiators of the second draft bill (Isamaa and EKRE) were prepared to negotiate and make amendments. He criticizes the coalition for its inability to cooperate, noting that they failed to seize the opportunity to advance both bills in order to find the best solution. He sees potential for collaboration, provided it results in improved legislation.
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
Information regarding cooperation in the current context is unavailable; the speaker represents the party's (EKRE) opposing stance on the bill, stating that the party does not support the draft legislation. Previous cooperation during Jüri Ratas's government is mentioned, when EKRE championed the original idea.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Acknowledges the substance and concrete justification of the amendments put forward by the opposition colleagues (Rain Epler, Kert Kingo) and the parliamentary group. It asks the government when they intend to start considering the opposition's constructive proposals—a move that would signal a desire for substantive cooperation—but simultaneously expresses skepticism regarding whether this will actually materialize.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker concludes by making a direct appeal to support the bill presented by the Conservative People's Party of Estonia, seeking to gain broader backing. At the same time, he/she remains skeptical about the coalition's willingness to support a worthwhile initiative, which points to a strained atmosphere of cooperation.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Insufficient Data
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker cites the previous government coalition (Center Party, Isamaa, EKRE) as a positive example, highlighting their economy-boosting decisions (lowering excise duties). He regrets that the current government is not listening to opposition members, which, he notes, indicates a desire for constructive cooperation in improving regional policy, though he admits this cooperation is absent.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is predominantly confrontational with the government, but colleague Varro Vooglaid is referenced, who posed a similar question, which demonstrates intra-factional cohesion. There are no references to cross-party cooperation or a readiness for compromises.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient information.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
There is no direct reference to cross-party cooperation, but it proposes involving private sector funding in road construction as a solution (PPP/involvement of businesses), citing Latvia's experience as a positive example. It is prepared to support the government, provided it secures greater funding (200 million) for the Via Baltica project.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Cooperation is mentioned in the context of previous joint proposals with the Centre Party regarding changes to VAT. The current style is rather confrontational, focusing on defending the faction's positions and rejecting draft legislation. There is no reference to an active readiness for compromise or cross-party support concerning the ongoing bills.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is respectful and constructive, directed towards the Minister, the rapporteur, and the representative of the commission. The speaker seeks to identify better and simpler solutions (e.g., avoiding bureaucracy when transferring pension assets) and inquires about the extent of involvement (the Defence League, the Rescue Board).
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker expresses readiness to support the drafts ("they must, of course, be supported"), but simultaneously actively demands explanations and justifications. This points toward a rather controlling and detail-focused cooperation style, where support is conditional and requires receiving answers.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
No data available.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
Insufficient data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Not enough data.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
Data is scarce.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
It demonstrates cooperation within its political group, confirming Rene Kokk's statements and their shared opposition to the law. There is a complete lack of any indication of readiness to compromise with the opposition or engage in cross-party cooperation.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker is operating strictly within the opposition framework, representing EKRE's views and criticizing the coalition's inability to take substantive amendments into account. There are no indications of seeking cooperation or compromise; rather, the focus is on the committee's disregard for the opposition's proposals (such as the 0% land tax increase).
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation in this context is adversarial; the speaker criticizes the Finance Committee's decision to bundle the amendments from various factions into a single package. This prevented a vote on specific proposals aimed at making the car tax more palatable to the public.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The cooperation style shows a reliance on interest groups, citing the position of the Pensioners' Association, which confirms the poverty of Estonian pensioners. There is no data regarding cooperation with other Riigikogu factions or the search for compromises with the government.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates cooperation and alignment of views with colleagues (Aivar Kokk, Rene Kokk, Siim Pohlak), supporting their criticism concerning the substance of the bill and the 10% minimum increase. Regarding stakeholders, the necessity of involving the Central Union of Estonian Farmers and the Estonian Private Forest Union is stressed, referencing their positions in the concordance table. Finally, a proposal is submitted on behalf of the Conservative People's Party faction.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The speaker refers positively to colleagues (Helir-Valdor Seeder) and supports the issues raised by another politician (Martin Helme) and the Isamaa party, suggesting cooperation among opposition factions. Openness to compromise with the government is not mentioned.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
No data available.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Information is scarce. The speaker refers to the appeal made by the Estonian Association of Cities and Municipalities to the Ministry of Education and Research, which demonstrates support for the concerns of local governments and an identification with them, but direct cooperation with parliamentary factions is not evident.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The cooperative approach is focused on the faction’s internal activities, with the proposal being put forward on behalf of the Estonian Conservative People’s Party faction. There are no indications of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation regarding this draft bill, as the proposal calls for its immediate rejection.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The speeches reveal no willingness to cooperate or any indication of cross-party activity. The tone is purely oppositional and questioning, focusing on demanding accountability and explanations from the presenters and ministers.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates cooperation within their faction by approvingly referencing the statistical comparison method introduced by a colleague (Jaak Valge) for analyzing abortions. Collaboration with other parties is not directly evident from the speeches, as the focus is on expressing opposition and posing questions.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is predominantly oppositional towards the ruling coalition and the rapporteurs of the draft bill. The speaker bases their argumentation on the risks presented in the harmonization table of the Republic's Electoral Commission (RVK) and demands that the RVK's proposals be taken into account.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker supports the government-initiated bill, which demonstrates a willingness to back policies that he/she deems appropriate. He/She mentions that the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of the Interior are consulting on proposals put forward by bankruptcy trustees and bailiffs, signaling a readiness for inter-ministerial coordination regarding future legislation.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker expresses appreciation to the Rural Affairs Committee and to those who introduced this topic to the floor, as well as to the sector-specific organizations (the Chamber of Veterinarians, the Chamber of Agriculture and Commerce, and the University of Life Sciences). The continuing education solution developed by the Estonian University of Life Sciences using its own resources is particularly commended, as it helps former veterinarians return to the sector. This cooperation is focused on finding solutions together with the sector and with politicians who grasp the issue.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker presents a proposal on behalf of the Estonian Conservative People's Party (EKRE), thereby indicating strong cooperation based within the faction. The previous stances of a colleague (Rene Kokk) are also referenced, which demonstrates internal coordination. Cross-party or compromise-oriented cooperation is absent.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
It refers to the Estonian Conservative People's Party's (EKRE) earlier proposal regarding the bank tax, demonstrating internal party consensus. It also references a colleague's view ("just as Moonika said"), confirming the existence of communication within the opposition.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Cooperation with other parties is not mentioned, but the speaker refers approvingly to his colleague Ants, continuing the topic he raised. The primary mode of interaction is the detailed questioning of the presenter and the highlighting of procedural errors.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker references the issue of working hours raised by a colleague (Andres), which indicates cooperation within their own faction on specific topics. However, there is no evidence of cross-party compromise or broad-based collaboration.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker refers to cooperation with colleagues (referencing the "benchmate issue"), demonstrating a willingness to support topics initiated by others. Communication with the minister is courteous and centered on the exchange of information, suggesting an openness to constructive dialogue.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speeches contain no reference to cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other political parties. The speaker instead represents and defends the positions of their own party (EKRE), demanding clear political plans and answers from the opposing side.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker clearly supports the bill submitted by the Conservative People's Party of Estonia regarding the abolition of expense compensations, demonstrating a willingness to back the opposition partner's initiative. At the same time, the work of the commission is criticized, which suggests difficulties in reaching a broad-based compromise.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The style of cooperation is evident in the expectation that the government (specifically the Ministry of Climate, the Minister of Economic Affairs, the Prime Minister, and the Minister of Regional Affairs) should have collaborated more effectively when bringing strategic investments to Estonia. Information regarding internal cooperation within the Riigikogu (Parliament) is unavailable.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
Not enough data.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker expressed willingness to support the draft bill restricting suffrage on a cross-party basis, calling on both coalition partners and the opposition to act jointly in order to fulfill a provision of the coalition agreement. At the same time, the speaker was critical of the government, arguing that it should be guided by the interests of the state, not solely by the coalition agreement.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker references their party's (EKRE) prior legislative work (the bank tax bill) and quotes colleagues (Rain Epler, Varro Vooglaid, Kalle Grünthal), demonstrating strong internal party cooperation. There is no indication of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party collaboration.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Lack of data
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is characterized by openness to answering questions and a willingness to agree with questioners on certain economic principles (e.g., the importance of profit, the positive impact of lowering excise duties). The primary focus, however, remains on garnering support for their faction's draft bill, while stressing that this represents the minimum action achievable in the current circumstances.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The style of cooperation is demonstrated by repeating and supporting the colleague's (Mart Helme's) question, indicating internal consistency. There is no mention of cross-party cooperation or willingness to compromise with the government.
2024-02-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The cooperation style is respectful and appreciative, starting with valuing the presenter's work. The speaker is engaged in posing a constructive question to clarify the funding objectives and their impact on Estonian-Ukrainian cooperation.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker starts by commending the previous presentation, showing respect and appreciation for the insightful overview. A willingness to collaborate is then expressed by offering a solution framed as a question, while simultaneously looking for ways to boost consumption.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker supportively referenced the arguments made by the previous speaker (Henn Põlluaas) regarding the specific sections of the Food Act, thereby demonstrating collaboration with like-minded colleagues. The closing remarks urged all members of parliament to support the draft bill, indicating a desire to achieve broad-based support necessary for ensuring consumer safety.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The collaborative style is respectful, involving addressing the rapporteur for information about the draft bill and the NGO's operations. The speaker is seeking clarity on parliamentary procedures, which indicates a desire to participate in the process, but there are no references to cross-party collaboration.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Mention is made of earlier unsuccessful negotiations with the ministry concerning Jõhvi funding, where the aim was to increase the funding and extend the deadline. This indicates a desire to find solutions, but simultaneously highlights the lack of cooperation caused by rigid rules. There is no data available regarding the current inter-party cooperation.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The bill was initiated in collaboration with colleague Martin Helme. Hope was expressed that the proposal could secure majority support in the Riigikogu, referencing potential cross-party cooperation on security matters. However, it is simultaneously stressed that opposition bills are rejected without even examining their substance.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker addressed colleagues and directly requested support for the presented bills, signaling a desire to achieve legislative approval. Specific cooperation partners, co-sponsors, or cross-party engagement were not mentioned.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker signals support for the positions taken by previous speakers, provided they coincide with his own strong stance on property rights and opposition to mandatory measures. While there are no explicit references to cross-party cooperation, his endorsement of decision-making freedom for associations indicates a readiness to accept local solutions.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is evident in the submission of the bill together with Rain Epler, which points to intra-faction collaboration. Otherwise, he focuses on presenting his own initiatives and questioning the minister. There are no indications of broad-based or cross-party compromise.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient Data.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The cooperation style is primarily confrontational, but the need to collaborate is mentioned to ensure the survival of the nation-state and guarantee a sense of security. Agreement is noted with the views of colleague Rain Epler regarding the inadequacy of the investigation, which suggests a readiness for alliances within the opposition.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The current style of cooperation is characterized by information seeking and questioning, involving direct appeals to the rapporteur for clarification. There is a noticeable absence of references to cross-party collaboration or willingness to compromise.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker collaborates with colleagues (Kert Kingo, Arvo Aller, Rain Epler) on the submission and support of draft legislation. The style of cooperation is open, inviting all members of the Riigikogu to support the bills that have been submitted.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The data is insufficient. (The statement was presented as a question to the minister, which suggests oversight and demanding accountability rather than cooperation.)