By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The speaker is active in plenary sessions, participating in multiple debates on the same day concerning constitutional amendments. He/She is aware of the discussions held in the committee and refers to them in his/her speeches.

The speaker is participating in the plenary session, presenting a substantive position on the draft bill and requesting procedural clarification regarding the voting results. Data is unavailable concerning other activity patterns, such as frequency of appearances or meetings.

An active participant in the state budget proceedings during the plenary session, both posing questions to the rapporteur and delivering a longer, substantive speech. They procedurally requested additional time (three minutes), which demonstrates a desire to thoroughly address the topic and clarify their position.

The speaker actively participates in the legislative process, posing questions to the bill's rapporteur and delivering a speech during the second reading of the draft legislation. He/She closely monitors the activities of government members, specifically noting the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry's foreign trip to Saudi Arabia.

The speaker is active in plenary sessions, asking questions and defending the bill initiated by his/her party. He/She is well-informed about the work of the committees, pointing to procedural obstacles within the Constitutional Committee and the inaction of the deputy chairman.

The Speaker is active during the plenary session, participating in the debate and submitting repeated follow-up questions. He/She notes that, as a member of the Riigikogu Presidium, his/her activities are focused on the plenary chamber, since participation in committee meetings is limited.

The speaker actively participates in plenary sessions, posing questions regarding the Prime Minister's report. Participation in the work of the committee (ELAK) is also mentioned, as is the rapid electronic review of the report materials.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session of the Riigikogu, taking part in an interpellation directed at the Minister of Regional Affairs and posing several detailed questions during the first reading of both the waterway fee and the amendments to the Sports Act. This pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on both broad political criticism and the technical scrutiny of draft legislation.