By Plenary Sessions: Helmen Kütt

The criticism is directed at the drafters of the bill (the ministry) due to the inadequacy of the legal text and the establishment of insufficient social norms. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, emphasizing that the draft law violates the principles of legality and creates problems for local governments when interpreting the law.

The main conflict is with the Minister of Culture and the ministry, who are being criticized for undervaluing workers in the cultural sector and delaying systemic reform. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, focusing on unequal wage increases and the necessity of initiating negotiations with TALO.

The objection is directed at the effectiveness of the minister's performance, particularly in managing the agricultural sector crisis (the Ekseko redundancies), criticizing the actions taken as being delayed and insufficient. The criticism is policy-based and results-oriented.

The opposition is directed at the actions of the Reform Party and the Prime Minister, criticizing their alleged reliance solely on certain entrepreneurs and their inability to engage in broad-based discussion. Furthermore, the government's claims regarding the increase in disability benefits are being challenged, with specific excluded groups being pointed out. The criticism is primarily policy- and procedure-based.

The primary opposition is aimed at the inaction of the Prime Minister and the government concerning the underfunding of specialized care services, which has led to a decline in service accessibility. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of failing to fulfill its state duties and forcing local municipalities to pursue legal recourse. The government's fiscal policy (VAT) is also indirectly criticized.

The opposition is aimed at the deficiencies in the government's social policy, particularly the inadequate budgetary provisions for specialized welfare services. A political disagreement has been highlighted with the Minister of Education and Research concerning the division of responsibility between the state and local municipalities regarding the provision of these specialized care services.

The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the minister, criticizing both the substance of the motor vehicle tax bill and the inadequacy of the socio-political measures proposed. The criticism is policy-based (focusing on the increase of inequality) and procedural (concerning the slow handling of the Chancellor of Justice’s proposals). The speaker sharply refutes the allegations made by opponents who have attempted to associate the Social Democrats with supporting the car tax.