By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Data is scarce.

Economic perspectives are heavily focused on reducing taxes, particularly the value-added tax (VAT), in order to ease the burden on consumers. The government's policy of raising taxes is viewed as unreasonable, as it was implemented without any prior analysis of the impact on consumers.

They strongly oppose the squandering of taxpayer money in state institutions, demanding that the expenditures of the Health Insurance Fund (advertising, consulting, and parties) be brought under control. They criticize tax policies that place the burden on vulnerable groups (such as the car tax for disabled individuals), accusing the state of profiting at the expense of the weakest members of society. They advocate for fiscal discipline and oppose the continuous upward trend in administrative and governance costs.

Supports stricter regulation of business, demanding mandatory traffic insurance and in-app age verification from rental companies (e.g., Bolt). It is critical of the current situation where freedom of enterprise outweighs the protection of public health.

Economic outlooks highlight the issue of declining consumer purchasing power and low confidence, which is dampening consumption. It is noted that the growth in net wages is significantly lagging behind price increases, which is the primary cause of the drop in consumption. There is a demand for improved fiscal discipline and budget transparency, criticizing the practice of leaving funds unused under the guise of closing services.

Economic views are strongly opposed to tax increases. Specific criticism is aimed at the car tax and the hike in VAT to 24%, which has driven up the cost of food and services. The government is being accused of worsening the financial situation of families and essentially robbing them through what is termed "quadruple taxation." Support is voiced for abolishing these taxes and implementing compensation mechanisms to ease social pressure.