By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Data on the style of cooperation is scarce, but persistent support for the bill is evident, suggesting collaboration with the bill's initiators. There is no openness to compromise with the government, as the government's opposition has been consistent and unjustified.

The collaborative approach is highly supportive of the submitter of the popular initiative, whose efforts and arguments are acknowledged. The speaker stresses the necessity of quickly drafting the popular initiative into a bill, indicating a readiness to work alongside the initiative's supporters.

There is no direct mention of cross-party cooperation, but the speaker stresses the necessity of involving the association of disabled people and top legal experts in the legislative drafting process. Regarding the car tax bill, he advocates for completing the first reading to enable the submission of amendments, suggesting a pragmatic willingness to improve the legislation.

Demonstrates cooperation with their political party (the Centre Party) in the submission of draft legislation. It also refers to previous support from ministry officials for the draft bill on a unified insurance obligation, which failed to gain political approval.

Insufficient data.

The speaker focuses on the opposition and initiatives of their own political party (the Center Party), referencing the Center Party's draft bill aimed at introducing special provisions for people with disabilities. There is a complete absence of any reference to cooperation with coalition partners or a willingness to compromise regarding the car tax issue.