By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

Total Sessions: 6

Fully Profiled: 6

2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The focus is national (Estonian economy, budget deficit) and international, specifically involving the comparison of economic competitiveness with Lithuania concerning the bank tax and labor taxes. Specific local or regional projects are not mentioned.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
Strong emphasis on rural residents and regional policy issues, criticizing government measures that make rural life too expensive and unfavorable. Specific examples cited are the public transport situation in Pärnu County and the cancellation of free bus travel on county lines.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The focus is clearly national and macroeconomic, covering the state budget, internal security, and the position of the Estonian economy within the European Union. Border construction with Russia is mentioned, but there are no references to specific local or regional projects or communities.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The politician is heavily focused on protecting the interests of rural residents, stressing that the car tax will hit hardest those who lack alternative public transportation and for whom a vehicle is a necessity. He also criticizes the budget cuts aimed at the development of the eastern border.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The primary focus is on national economic and social policy, but emphasis is also placed on the negative consequences for people living in rural areas due to cuts in support payments. Internationally, Estonia's economic position within the European Union is highlighted (last place).
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The focus is primarily national (the Estonian economy, e-government development, reduction of bureaucracy) and international (European Union directives, comparison of AI investments with other EU countries). A comparison with Latvia regarding labor relations rules is also mentioned.