By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The pattern of activity is restricted to active and repeated participation in the Riigikogu plenary session concerning the processing of the supplementary budget, by submitting repetitive questions and delivering lengthy speeches.

Actively participates in plenary debates, presenting both substantive speeches and procedural requests (such as calling for a recess in their capacity as Vice-Chairman of the Finance Committee). Demonstrates a readiness to engage in fact-checking directly during the session, correcting inaccurate claims made by colleagues.

The MP was highly active during the plenary session debate on the supplementary budget, repeatedly posing questions, delivering an extended address, and submitting a motion to adjourn on behalf of their parliamentary group. These behavioral patterns suggest a strong focus on the current legislative process and continuous critique of the government's activities.

The politician is active during the Riigikogu session, intervening with both substantive speeches and procedural inquiries. He utilizes his position as Vice-Chairman of the Finance Committee to request recesses before votes, pursuant to the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure Act.

The pattern of activity is confined to speaking during the plenary session, where the speaker repeatedly takes the floor and raises questions regarding the pending bill and the conduct of the session. The speaker actively engages in the debate, immediately responding to the statements and accusations made by opponents.

The patterns of activity are linked to the questions and formal inquiries (interpellations) raised during the Riigikogu plenary session, which fall under the purview of a specific minister. The speaker refers to earlier government pledges, last week’s negotiations, and the vote on the crypto-asset market law scheduled for the day after tomorrow.