By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The legislative focus is centered on opposing the negative supplementary budget and supporting the bill for taxing banking super-profits. Furthermore, the need to improve budget transparency is emphasized, and the commission's decision to restrict the rights of members of parliament regarding the submission of amendments is criticized, as it is deemed unconstitutional.

Key priorities include opposing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (facing strong opposition and a promise to challenge it in court) and opposing the amendments to the Land Tax Act (which is also opposed, with a proposal to terminate the proceedings). It supports the draft bill enabling the construction of a nuclear power plant and emphasizes the need for faster development of financial regulations (such as the Positive Credit Register and the Financial Ombudsman).

The legislative focus is resisting and rejecting the supplementary budget, a stance which is also supported by a proposal to filibuster the proceedings. The priority is highlighting alternative budget-saving measures (such as a special windfall tax on banks and maintaining the current tax bracket structure). The speaker is primarily a vocal opponent of bills initiated by the government.

The main legislative priorities are opposing the car tax bill and the regulation of the cryptocurrency market. He is an active proposer of amendments and insists on adherence to procedural rules, criticizing the coalition for violating the rules of procedure. He demands the rejection of the bills.

The legislative focus is currently on opposing a specific government bill aimed at repairing the state budget through tax hikes and cuts to subsidies. The speaker is a strong opponent of the bill, criticizing its negative impact on pensioners and the economy as a whole.

The legislative focus is on the Crypto-Asset Market Law (MiCA), the implementation of the positive credit rating system, and the application of the platform work directive. The speaker is critical of the government's inability to realize previous e-government initiatives, such as preventing data duplication and creating personalized state services (e.g., in healthcare and the Eesti.ee portal).