By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

The speaker clearly takes a stance supporting decentralized settlement while opposing urban densification and the "15-minute city" concept. It strongly advocates for preserving rural life and criticizes the government's economic policy, alleging that the 2023 budget contained an unfunded gap of 300–400 million euros. Furthermore, it expresses skepticism towards a rapid green transition, particularly concerning the mandatory adoption of electric vehicles.

The speaker adopts a distinctly critical position on the government's economic policy, particularly regarding the income tax reform, arguing that scrapping the reform, which costs half a billion, would resolve "half the issues." He places strong emphasis on the shortcomings of state supervision and calls for transparency and fair treatment within the business sector. Furthermore, he advocates for market economy principles in the energy sector, criticizing the current state of affairs where consumers are forced to "subsidize someone else's business."

The speaker strongly advocates for the positions of the Isamaa party, highlighting the party's achievements in establishing free higher education and state-run secondary schools. He takes a clearly adversarial stance toward the current coalition, accusing them of raising taxes and impoverishing the populace. The speaker strongly backs funding for the education system and increasing teachers' wages, demonstrating a consistent commitment to education policy.

The viewpoint strongly focuses on energy security and the necessity of dispatchable electricity generation in Estonia. It supports using pellet dust in oil shale boilers as a faster and cheaper alternative for achieving green energy goals, highlighting an 80-million investment versus 2 billion for other solutions. It criticizes the government's energy policy and the actions of Elering, asserting that money is being taken daily from the pockets of businesses.

The speaker adopts a clearly critical stance regarding Elering's operations, alleging that the company unfairly profits from cable failures at the expense of consumers. They strongly advocate for an alternative green energy solution—the conversion of the Narva oil shale boilers to run on pellet dust—seeing it as a practical and more affordable option compared to gas turbines or hydrogen. The speaker demands more active government intervention in the energy sector, particularly concerning the oversight of Elering's activities.

The speaker adopts a strongly critical stance on Estonia's energy policy, accusing the government and the ministry of making poor decisions. They support the continued use of biofuel and biogas in public transport, as well as the conversion of oil shale boilers to pulverized pellet fuel. The speaker expresses strong opposition to the current energy management, particularly the activities of Elering.