By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

The focus is on analyzing the draft bill concerning noise reduction, specifically by asking clarifying questions regarding the 300-meter restriction and its practical implications. It emphasizes the necessity of improving the draft bill and ensuring its more thorough review within the committee. Furthermore, interest is shown in transport and planning legislation, particularly concerning the balancing of development between rural areas and cities.

The focus is on the supervisory function, achieved by questioning ministers regarding the implementation of specific legislation. It supports stricter regulation of biofuel additives and calls for ensuring greater transparency. Furthermore, it monitors the necessity of legislative amendments within the energy sector and stresses the critical importance of proper adherence to legal statutes.

The focus is heavily placed on education and healthcare policy, specifically highlighting the free higher education and state gymnasium system initiated by the Isamaa party. Concrete proposals are put forward, such as implementing a mandatory work period for doctors in Estonia after they receive free education. There is also an expressed interest in fiscal policy, particularly concerning the financing of education and healthcare.

It focuses on energy legislation and supports a draft bill that provides various options for electricity generation. It emphasizes the need to discuss the use of pellet dust in oil shale boilers as a legislative alternative. It calls for clear conditions regarding the support and taxation of various energy production methods.

Focuses on issues of energy legislation and regulation, especially concerning Elering's responsibilities and the fulfillment of its obligations. It raises questions regarding the direction of the state's energy policy, including finding alternatives to oil shale energy. It calls for a clearer regulatory framework for defining the accountability of energy companies.

The discussion focuses on the Energy Act, questioning the commission’s decisions and the justifications provided for them. It criticizes the substance of the law, especially the handling of biofuels. Clarification is demanded regarding the impact of these legislative decisions on the Estonian energy sector and taxpayers.