By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

Sharply criticizes the current government, accusing it of stashing funds away and creating a budget deficit. It is claimed that the then finance minister misled voters about the state of the budget before the 2023 elections. The speaker demonstrates a skeptical attitude toward European Union policy, criticizing the financing and implementation of the Rail Baltic project.

Adopts a clearly oppositional stance towards the government, criticizing both the current Climate Minister and the former Environment Minister (who is now the Regional Minister). Criticizes the inaction of the Environment Agency and officials shirking responsibility. Highlights the government's failure to deliver on its promises and the inadequacy of oversight.

He/She adopts a sharply critical stance toward the current coalition, accusing them of implementing tax increases and impoverishing the populace. They assert that "the current coalition has done everything possible to ensure that 75% of Estonia's residents are even poorer." Furthermore, they criticize the reduction in road funding and general economic policy, while still maintaining a constructive approach to finding policy solutions.

Sharp criticism leveled against Elering, accusing the company of inefficiency and squandering business funds. The previous government is also criticized, particularly for delays in the construction of the gas terminal and high-voltage power lines. The opposition is primarily policy-centric, focusing on specific infrastructure projects and their management.

Sharply criticizes Elering's operations and management, accusing the company of profiting at the expense of consumers and shirking responsibility. Dissatisfaction is also expressed regarding the government's passive approach to resolving the energy crisis. The criticism is primarily policy- and performance-based, not personal, focusing instead on systemic problems within the energy sector.

He/She sharply criticizes Elering’s management and the actions of previous ministers, accusing them of causing 2 billion euros in damages. He/She expresses strong opposition to the current energy policy and decision-making processes. Officials are also blamed for their failure to act and for making poor decisions regarding biofuels.