By Agendas: Mait Klaassen

Total Agendas: 33

Fully Profiled: 33

2025-10-09
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the content of the presenter's submission, specifically for the omission of the human capital topic, and is not personal. The disagreement is policy-driven and moderate, presented in the form of a question seeking solutions and further information.
2025-10-08
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Chemical Act (701 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

Insufficient data.
2025-09-24
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The speaker criticizes the government's investment policy (as presented in the minister's report), deeming the 40% allocation directed toward rural areas far too small. The criticism is policy- and results-driven, focusing on the fact that the current distribution is incapable of eliminating regional disparities.
2025-09-18
Bank of Estonia 2024 Report

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.

Insufficient dataset
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The criticism targets the common administrative practice of imposing nature conservation restrictions without any requirement to notify or involve the property owners. The opposition is both procedural and policy-driven, stressing that such actions alienate owners and obstruct necessary conservation efforts.
2025-06-10
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The criticism targets deficiencies in the education system and curriculum development, seeking accountability from the individual or institution responsible for obstructing the implementation of the integrated curriculum. The critique itself is procedural and policy-driven, demanding the rectification of systemic errors.
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the Public Health Act (617 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

There is not enough data.
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the Environmental Levies Act (615 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the rapporteur of the draft legislation and those establishing the regulations, centering on specific policy details, such as the rationale behind the 20 km and 3 km distance requirements. The criticism targets the policy's lack of rationale, rather than individuals, although a colleague representing another faction is mentioned. The intensity is moderate, manifested through the posing of questions and the expression of doubts.
2025-03-20
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic to close the temporary control line between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation" (562 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition targets the deficiencies in the preparation of the draft bill, specifically the criticism regarding the insufficient analysis of the movement of Russian citizens. The criticism is policy-driven and centers on the inadequacy of the data and potential legal issues (sanctions, conventions).
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker is exercising the opposition's oversight role regarding the new government, criticizing potential cuts to higher education funding and demanding clarity on the government's future plans. The criticism is policy- and budget-based.
2025-02-26
Draft law amending the Hunting Act (567 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Data is lacking.
2025-02-19
Draft law amending the Defence Forces Organisation Act and the Economic Zone Act (strengthening maritime security) - first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the minister and centers on the practical deficiencies in implementing the draft legislation, particularly concerning coordination with neighboring countries. The opposition is not against the bill itself, but rather against the preparation for its execution, stressing that a potentially dangerous vessel should not simply be passed on to neighbors as a "gift."
2025-01-28
Draft law amending the Hunting Act (553 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

There is not enough data.
2024-12-18
Third reading of the draft law amending the Subsoil Act (435 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the opposition parties, who are being criticized for repeatedly stressing that the law is unconstitutional. The speaker views this as the opposition's job, but questions the accuracy of their claims, pointing out that analyses have not actually ruled the law unconstitutional. The criticism is specifically directed at their political role and the procedural challenges they are mounting.
2024-12-11
Second reading of the draft law amending the Subsoil Act (435 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

There is no direct confrontation, but the speaker is actively engaged in legal opposition, which stems from the assessment by the Riigikogu Legal and Analysis Department regarding inconsistency with the constitution. The speaker contrasts this with the Ministry of Climate’s stance that suspending the permits is a goal-oriented solution and the least burdensome option for individuals. The text also addresses the desire of environmental associations to extend the suspension for an additional year.
2024-12-10
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (461 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main confrontation was with the Isamaa faction, whose amendments for invalidating the motor vehicle tax and excluding the state fee were rejected. The opposition was based on political and budgetary grounds, citing the government's action plan and state budget calculations. Raimond Kaljulaid’s proposals concerning light personal transporters were also rejected, as they were not related to the current draft bill.
2024-11-21
Discussion of the nationally significant issue initiated by the Environment Committee: "The Impact of Climate Change on Estonia's Legal Framework and Economy."

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the current management model, which has led to a crisis and only requires damage control (S1). Furthermore, there is criticism regarding the extremely strong opposition to utilizing carbon sequestered from biomass, which prevents the replacement of fossil carbon (S2).
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism targets the government's actions, specifically citing the creation of excessive bureaucracy and complex documents that require specialized higher education to navigate. Furthermore, there is criticism regarding a potential loophole in the legislation designed to protect valuable agricultural land—a critique rooted in policy concerns.
2024-09-18
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Waste Act, the Traffic Act, and the State Fees Act (461 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The speaker presented criticism regarding the impact of the 800-euro state fee, pointing out that it could push people to look for alternatives and impose burdens on less solvent owners. The view was also relayed that the issue of illegal waste handlers can be resolved even without such a high state fee. A direct personal oppositional stance was not expressed; instead, the speaker conveyed the objections raised during the debate.
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at a practice recently adopted by the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA), which involves unannounced visits to the homes of gun owners. The criticism is procedural and constitutional, calling into question whether the PPA's actions comply with the principle of the inviolability of the home.
2024-09-11
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Subsoil Act (435 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The opposition is evident in the committee's voting results, where two members voted against adding the draft bill to the plenary agenda and concluding the first reading. The speaker does not criticize the opponents or analyze their motives, but notes the opposition purely in procedural and numerical terms.
2024-06-12
Overview of the Judicial Administration by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

Not enough data
2024-06-06
Proposal by the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the regulation concerning the building prohibition zone of the Nature Conservation Act into compliance with the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The speaker refutes the potential objection that people will start maliciously exploiting the change, arguing that this fear is unfounded. There is no direct criticism of opponents or naming of specific groups.
2024-05-30
Discussion of the nationally important issue: "How can the state avoid living in debt?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

Criticism is directed against the course of decisions taken by the Government of the Republic of Estonia, doubting their correctness regarding fiscal consolidation. The opposition is intense, as warnings are being issued about the onset of a direct catastrophe if the budget is not reformed. The criticism is policy-based and results-oriented.
2024-05-13
Proposal by the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act, the Credit Institutions Act, the Law of Obligations Act, and the State Fees Act into conformity with the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed primarily at the potential consequences of the draft law, rather than specific adversaries. The criticism is policy-driven, voicing concern over excessive bank oversight and the infringement of fundamental rights.
2024-04-11
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue: "How to Ensure the Future of Veterinary Medicine"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the state's funding policy, particularly the proposal to add 2 million euros, which is viewed merely as replacing paid tuition with state budget funds, rather than being a solution that brings about genuine improvement. The state is also criticized for its inability to allocate sufficient resources to support clinical training.
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Increasing the Birth Rate of the Estonian People" (283 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

There is no direct confrontation with specific individuals or groups. The criticism is aimed at a procedural deficiency, namely the absence of social research as the basis for the new support measures.
2024-03-07
Debate on the matter of national importance, "The Future of Estonian Energy 2035," initiated by the Estonian Reform Party parliamentary group.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the fundamental principles underlying the government's investment decisions, suspecting that they may be empirical rather than based on thorough study. The objection is both procedural and policy-based, emphasizing the need to avoid past mistakes where investments were left standing idle.
2024-02-22
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Council Election Act (287 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The opposition consists of the bill's proponents, whose political optimism regarding the disappearance of political maneuvering is deemed unfounded. The criticism is policy-driven, centering on the fact that the draft deprives local residents of the right to form electoral coalitions and participate in local life.
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

There are no direct attacks on opponents, but the speaker criticizes the common narrative of referring to the tax simply as a "car tax." The criticism targets the misinterpretation of the tax's true purpose, seeking to highlight its environmental objective.
2024-01-25
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Atmospheric Air Protection Act (160 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary confrontation is directed against the claims of the presenter and the Environmental Committee, who are criticized for failing to analyze the fundamental principles of atmospheric physics. The criticism is intense and strictly substantive, emphasizing that the opposing party's assertions cannot possibly be true under any circumstances.
2024-01-18
Debate on the National Issue of Crucial Importance: "Strong Rural Schools and a Strong School Network"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data. The speaker is neither criticizing nor opposing the presenter; instead, they are asking clarifying questions.