By Plenary Sessions: Ando Kiviberg

The speaker demonstrates significant interest in inter-factional cooperation, specifically inquiring about coordinating the bill proposed by Isamaa with either the Center Party faction or its board. He/She cites a successful negotiation experience in Tallinn as an example, which suggests an openness toward forming coalitions and reaching compromises.

The style of cooperation is institutional, focusing on the work of the commission and its communication with the ministries. The speaker, acting as the chairman of the commission, promises to monitor the progress of the ODIHR recommendations within the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs, thereby ensuring that the necessary amendments are initiated. He clearly distinguishes his personal viewpoint from that of the commission.

Describes structured cooperation with Arne Koitmäe, the head of the Republic of Estonia Electoral Service, and other members of the commission. It demonstrates readiness for institutional cooperation by formally addressing the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs in writing regarding the consideration of ODIHR recommendations and the preparation of necessary amendments. Consensus was reached within the commission regarding procedural decisions.

The style of cooperation is aimed at mobilizing its own faction (Eesti 200) and supporting the government's solution, calling on all good colleagues to do the same. Instead of seeking compromise with the opposition, indignation is expressed over their criticism, and it is hinted that they should be grateful that someone else is doing the "nasty job."

The collaborative style is formal and demanding, requesting the minister to inform colleagues about the alternatives. Reference is made to the topic having been raised previously by the Isamaa Minister of Justice, which demonstrates awareness of the cross-party history, but currently, the tone is rather confrontational.