By Plenary Sessions: Ando Kiviberg

The speaker is active in the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) as a questioner and has participated in the work of the Constitutional Committee. He/She highlights his/her activity in questioning candidates, noting that he/she was the only person to question the Supreme Court candidate before the committee. This points to detailed and procedural engagement.

The speaker is active during the plenary session, repeatedly answering questions about the draft election law, presumably as the committee's rapporteur or chairperson. He/She referenced his/her earlier work on the same subject last Thursday, demonstrating consistent involvement in the legislative process and a commitment to accountability.

Acting as the rapporteur for the Constitutional Committee during the Riigikogu plenary session, [he/she] provides an overview of the recent sitting and the committee’s activities. [He/She] mentions the public hearing organized by the committee regarding the ODIHR report and the written appeal submitted to the Ministry of Justice. This operational pattern is characterized by the detailed and timely communication of the committee’s work.

The speaker actively participates in plenary discussions, delivering substantive speeches and requesting procedural time extensions, which indicates active involvement in steering the debate. He/She refers to extensive prior engagement with experts and officials outside the chamber.

The speaker participates in the plenary session, posing a question to the minister, which indicates active involvement in the debates. Data regarding the frequency or rhythm of these appearances is scarce.