By Agendas: Raimond Kaljulaid

Total Agendas: 51

Fully Profiled: 51

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (661 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is direct and interrogative, focusing on demanding specific facts and definitions. Practical, everyday examples are used to clarify the content of the bill, while simultaneously emphasizing procedural transparency.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
Interpellation concerning the unspent budget funds of the Ministry of Education and Research (No. 805)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, yet critical and persistent, addressing the government's "influential and important minister." The speaker employs foresight by referencing the Speaker's potential intervention to underscore the significance of the question, even if it strays slightly from the immediate topic. The tone is primarily logical and procedural, stressing the necessity of resolving a long-term issue.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the insufficient state funding of school meals and the resulting inequality (No. 797)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style begins anecdotally and ironically, drawing an analogy between the daily life of the Riigikogu (catering, concentration levels) and school life. In the substantive section, the tone becomes critical and direct, employing a simple yet effective comparison (Swedbank) to criticize the practice of shirking responsibility. It concludes with a direct challenge to the minister: "Or am I mistaken?".
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the transfer of Swedish criminals to Estonia (No. 803)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The rhetorical style is critical and ironic, starting with a comparison to a satirical sketch ("Tujurikkuja") to highlight the debate's lack of seriousness. The speaker employs direct questions and rhetoric to challenge the minister, demanding an anwer regarding whether the impact on reputation has been assessed. An emotional appeal (damage to reputation) is utilized alongside a logical demand for analysis.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-23
Inquiry regarding the cessation of number plate recognition cameras (no. 793)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The style is formal, analytical, and questioning in nature, addressing the minister directly. The speaker begins with a respectful tone but then presents a detailed and logical critique of the deficiencies in the supervisory procedures, drawing upon the work of the commission.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Request for Information Regarding PPA Employee Salaries (No. 780)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The style is critical and argumentative, combining detailed economic analysis (deciles) with strong emotional appeals regarding social justice. Contrasting imagery is used (those entering a burning house versus those staying in a warm room) to emphasize the value-based difference in priorities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Inquiry Regarding the Kopli Commando (no. 774)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is combative, sharply critical, and at times ironic, especially directed at the opposition (the Centre Party), who are branded as "populists." Both logical arguments are employed (fiscal responsibility, 1+1=2) as well as emotional and personal attacks, referring to the opponents' statements as an "obsession" and comparing them to a soda machine.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Second reading of the draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and other laws (662 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The rhetorical style is serious, urgent, and acknowledging, thanking the drafters of the bill and colleagues. Both logical arguments (people spend the majority of their time at home) and emotional appeals (saving human lives) are utilized. The speech is formal and focuses on justifying the necessity of the legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
An inquiry regarding the hindrance of development in the defence industry (no 783)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The tone is sharp, urgent, and argumentative, emphasizing the seriousness of the situation in the context of the war waged by the neighbor. It employs logical appeals, referencing specific deadlines and the criticism leveled by experts (Taavi Veskimägi), and repeatedly poses rhetorical questions concerning the issue of responsibility. The style is formal, but also includes ironic remarks (e.g., regarding the chancellor's responsibility).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-11
Draft law amending the Holiday and Commemoration Day Act (636 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The tone is polite and respectful, beginning by praising and thanking the presenter ('Very good presentation!'). The style is rather logical and analytical, focusing on posing questions and evaluating the economic impact. Emotional appeals are avoided; the emphasis is strictly on rational doubt.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is critical and argumentative, emphasizing logical connections and factual evidence (with references to the National Audit Office). The tone is occasionally sharp, particularly concerning the government's activities and the recommendation for the minister's resignation, yet the contribution of Ministry of Defence officials is simultaneously acknowledged. The metaphor of "silos" is employed to describe the communication deficiencies between the legislative and executive branches.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry Regarding the Development of Nuclear Energy in Estonia (No. 786)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The style is formal ("Honorable Chairman of the Session! Honorable Minister!") and analytical, utilizing the direct question format. The appeal is logical and cautionary, relying on historical precedent (Russia’s patterns of behavior in Ukraine) and a hypothetical scenario to emphasize the vulnerability of the infrastructure.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding the government's plans to increase immigration (no. 791)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, repeatedly employing questions to address the government during the inquiry. The tone is cautious and cautionary, emphasizing a logical appeal to historical experience and noting that the current arguments are "exactly the same" as those used previously.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding the loss of essential banking services from county centers (no. 773)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and analytical, focusing on the logical demand for specific data and metrics. The speaker contrasts emotional assessments with the numerical indicators required by a leader, emphasizing the importance of accountability and goal setting. The tone is demanding and inquiry-driven.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The rhetoric is predominantly critical and demanding, especially when assessing the government's activities, employing sarcasm and rhetorical questions (e.g., comparing delays to road maintenance acts). The speaker strongly emphasizes the necessity of accountability and makes a powerful appeal for safeguarding the reputation of the Riigikogu and public trust. The style is formal but includes emotional and value-based appeals (e.g., children's safety, undermining national defense).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Inquiry Regarding Electrical Power Generation Capacities (No. 746)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The rhetorical style is serious and concerned, emphasizing the critical nature and urgency of threats related to national defense. The speaker primarily employs logical argumentation, focusing on procedural deficiencies and framing the question as a direct inquiry. The tone is formal and demanding, underscoring the necessity of completing the analyses.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry Regarding Estonian Environmental Policy (No. 743)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The rhetorical style is analytical and formal. It uses a personal example (blackberry jam) as an introduction before moving on to logical arguments concerning industry and security. The criticism is aimed at political instability, communicating entrepreneurs' concerns about the volatility of environmental policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
An inquiry regarding the illegal alteration of the order of protection of natural objects (no. 738)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The rhetorical style is critical and question-driven, employing emotional appeal and linking the trust of landowners to national defense obligations (the Defense League/Kaitseliit). The speaker adopts the perspective of the common person and uses anecdotal evidence to highlight procedural injustice, demanding a direct concession from the minister regarding the seriousness of the situation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is ironic and slightly condescending, aiming to steer the debate toward a more rational track while avoiding it becoming "absurd." Sarcasm and humor are employed (referencing transgender admirals) to underscore the irrelevance of the opposing side's arguments.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
On the Management of the Ministry of Defence

15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The rhetorical style is sharp, demanding, and combative, focusing on calling for accountability. Strong emotional phrases are employed (e.g., "dawdling," "unacceptable") alongside repetitive numerical emphasis (six months, 133 days). The speaker poses blunt questions directly to the Prime Minister, demanding that the Minister of Defense be shown a "red card."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the future of the ferry connection (no. 739)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is critical and demanding, posing a direct question to the minister regarding the legal basis of the policy. Both a logical appeal (reference to laws) and an emotional appeal are utilized, highlighting the resentment of the Hiiumaa residents and inter-island tensions. The tone is formal (addressing the chairman and the minister), but simultaneously passionate on the subject of regional injustice.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry regarding the reorganization of Kehtna Vocational Education Centre and Vana-Vigala Technical and Service School (no 733)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The style is formal and interrogative, using logical juxtaposition (economic rationality versus regional conscience) to elicit a clear answer. The speaker is polite, acknowledging the minister's good relationship with business leaders, but essentially presents a confrontational choice. At the end, an apology is offered for running over time.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
Inquiry Regarding the Disruption of Railway Construction in Rohuküla (No. 731)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is direct, practical, and interrogative, specifically aimed at the minister to secure a concrete assurance. A logical appeal is employed, connecting the road conditions to the tourist season and the region's overall visitor traffic, thereby highlighting the time-sensitive urgency of resolving the issue.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry Regarding Rural Areas (no. 713)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker employs a formal, respectful, and collaborative style, addressing the Minister deferentially and highlighting shared perspectives. He/She uses a personal example (two residences in Tallinn and Hiiumaa) to test and substantiate the logical proposal.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry regarding the social welfare reform (no 720)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The style is formal and interrogative, directly addressing the Minister to seek confirmation. The speaker employs logical arguments (cost reduction) to counter a prior negative claim, but proceeds cautiously, seeking validation for their interpretation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Inquiry regarding amendments to the Employment Contracts Act, or regarding occasional work contracts (no. 735)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is combative and insistent, employing strong negative descriptions (overburdened, underpaid, exhausted). Logical arguments (referencing studies) are mixed with direct accusations regarding the opponents’ motives (doing the wrong thing in the interest of sponsors).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
Third reading of the draft law amending the Defence Organisation Act and the Economic Zone Act (Strengthening Maritime Security) (565 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The style in question is formal, analytical, and serious, emphasizing the logical necessity of the legislation and the subsequent funding. The tone shifts to critical and concerned when addressing the executive branch's inability to ensure adequate readiness and funding. The speaker employs comparisons (Ukraine) and geographical arguments to underscore the criticality of the situation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-17
Inquiry regarding the third year of record-low birth rates in Estonia (no. 703)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is formal and critical, directly linking a social problem (the birth rate) to national security and the government's leadership crisis. A direct question is posed to the Prime Minister to compel him/her to take a definitive position on supporting the Minister of Defence. The tone is one of concern, emphasizing the logical necessity for competent governance.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-12
New government tax policy

The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The style is formal and fact-based, demanding very specific information from the Prime Minister for the Riigikogu (Parliament). Rhetorical contrast is employed (surprise at finding oneself in opposition) and logical appeal is emphasized, referencing the former Prime Minister's previous clear position. The tone is sharp and demanding, although a personally friendly address is used in the introduction ("Dear Kristen!").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
Draft law amending the Local Government Organisation Act (537 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The style is professional, logical, and urgent, emphasizing the necessity of solving a serious nationwide problem. The speaker extensively utilizes data and statistics for persuasion, demonstrating the scope of the problem (e.g., "more than one [challenge] per day"). He/She systematically answers questions, explaining the simplicity and efficacy of the draft bill and refuting arguments that the solution should wait for a more comprehensive reform.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is critical, decisive, and at times combative, especially when directed at the Foreign Minister. The speaker employs both historical arguments and emotional appeals (passing on the debt of gratitude to Ukraine). He uses sharp metaphors (Ukrainians are being offered "the French President's pennant and the German Chancellor's tie pin") and warns against the politics of sycophants and flatterers.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic for the procurement of ammunition with a cost of 1.6 billion euros for the years 2025–2028" (540 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is initially formal and appreciative, but quickly turns sharp and accusatory, utilizing the "ping-pong" metaphor. The appeals are primarily logical and grounded in historical facts, highlighting specific dates, percentages, and comparisons (e.g., the volume of procurements was five times smaller). The tone is serious, but at the same time strongly accusatory regarding the opposition's previous failures to act.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution (486 OE) of the Riigikogu regarding the extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia's international obligations in a post-conflict peacekeeping operation in Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria.

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is highly combative and sharply oppositional, especially towards the EKRE faction, who are branded as "noisy trolls" and "shouters." Strong emotional accusations are employed, including the spreading of Kremlin narratives and engaging in "tasteless and stupid attention seeking." The style is formal, but it is interrupted by repeated procedural interventions aimed at maintaining order.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (527 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is predominantly aggressive and polemical, aimed at criticizing Isamaa and EKRE for political hypocrisy and incompetence. Sharp rhetorical questions ("Was there no courage?") and accusations of holding the Riigikogu (Parliament) hostage are employed. Logical arguments (deficiencies in the draft laws) are mixed with historical examples (the Tallinn elections) to discredit the opponents’ maneuvers, labeling their activities "legal nihilism."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the Weapons Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (468 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The style is twofold: the first address is formal, detailed, and procedural (in the role of the rapporteur for the leading committee). Subsequent statements, however, become critical and combative, particularly directed at the Isamaa party. Economic and logical appeals are employed, emphasizing that this is a "revenue bill" and not an "expenditure bill."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is highly combative, direct, and demanding, especially toward the session chair and those causing disruption. Sharp and personal language is employed ("you're talking rubbish here," "don't mouth off," "pathetic"), and while the appeals are logical (referencing laws), they are delivered with intense emotional strain. The speaker's objective is to achieve the immediate restoration of order, demanding a recess or even the resignation of the chair.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft Security Tax Act (512 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The style is serious, urgent, and at times confrontational, emphasizing the extreme gravity of the issue and the existential threat facing the state. Both emotional appeals (referencing the film "Names in Marble. 2") and logical argumentation are employed, contrasting actual needs with the concept of "affordable" national defense. Sharp criticism is directed at the opposition and the Minister of Finance, accusing them of populism and disregarding the debate.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (426 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is defensive and aggressive toward the opposition, accusing them of "populism" and failing to do substantive work (having "failed to clear the bar"). When addressing security issues, the tone is serious, emphasizing the logical necessity of preparedness, while simultaneously employing strong emotional language (e.g., "unfounded and despicable"). The speaker attempts to balance the defense of the government with a call for meaningful cooperation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-24
Draft law amending the Arms Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (468 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The speech is formal and procedural, characteristic of a committee rapporteur. The style is logical and neutral, focusing on facts, conveying the substance of the committee's discussion, and detailing the legislative process. Emotional appeals are not used; the emphasis is placed on the precise description of the circumstances.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-11
Minister of Defence's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is serious and pressing, focusing on logical arguments and facts to underscore the gravity of the threat posed by the Russian Federation and the necessity of increasing defense expenditures. The speech is formal and analytical, containing both procedural remarks (such as requesting additional time) and sharp criticism regarding synchronization issues. Direct references are made to foreign policy events and statements (Kirill, US elections).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.

The rhetorical style is extremely aggressive, accusatory, and ironic, labeling the session "a complete farce." Strong emotional appeals and rhetorical questions are employed to cast doubt on the opponents' honesty and motives ("did they not have these values back then?"). The style relies primarily on historical political attacks and accusations of hypocrisy against the opposition.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-13
Second reading of the Draft Act amending the Foreign Service Act and amending other related acts (Bill 353 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The style is formal and polite, addressing the colleague directly, yet it relies heavily on institutional memory and personal recollections. The criticism regarding the past is emotionally charged (using the words "shameful" and "unworthily"), whereas the current appeal is straightforward and seeks information.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Third Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Traffic Act and the Police and Border Guard Act (429 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The style of the speech is constructive and analytical, focusing on core political principles (balanced safety and comfort). The introduction features a personal and positive address to a colleague, congratulating them on their outstanding election result, which establishes a cooperative tone. The delivery is formal and logic-driven, deliberately avoiding emotional appeals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-04
First Reading of the Bill for the Act Amending the Emergency Situation Act and Related Acts (426 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is constructive, respectful, and procedural, emphasizing the seriousness of the topic and the need to avoid premature conclusions. The speaker employs logical arguments, urging listeners to wait for the results of the committee's discussion and to consider all arguments before forming a position. He uses appreciative language, praising the actions of the Prime Minister and the board.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (409 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Implement Effective Measures to Protect Minors from Exposure to Pornography"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The tone is initially appreciative and polite, but quickly turns critical and ironic, especially on the topic of the government's alleged super-competence. A vivid and memorable analogy is used ("to move four tons of sand with a teaspoon") to emphasize the draft bill's inefficiency and symbolic nature.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-30
First reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the European Parliament Election Act (lowering the voting and candidacy age) (414 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The style is analytical and logic-driven, relying on data and legislative examples to dismantle the link between age and competence. It employs direct address toward opponents (Reinsalu, Valge) and incorporates ironic humor, such as references to "fools of all ages" and the fact that adults believe "complete nonsense" about the war in Ukraine. The overall tone is supportive and convincing, underscoring the SDE's resolute position.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
Third reading of the Bill (332 SE) on the Amendment of the International Sanctions Act and the Amendment of other related Acts.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The style is decisive, confident, and persuasive, concluding with a clear recommendation to vote boldly in favor of the bill. Both logical arguments (security does not depend on silence) and colloquial imagery ("don't poke the bear") are employed to discredit counterarguments. The tone is optimistic and highlights the importance of Estonia leading by example.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-06
A written motion submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is supportive while simultaneously being ironically cynical, particularly concerning the competence of ministers, which is characterized as opening "Pandora's Box." Historical analogies and logical arguments are employed to underscore the minister's strength and to oppose the vacuity of the opponents' claims. The tone remains formal within the Riigikogu (Parliament) context, yet it is laced with sarcasm regarding the opposition's true motives.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is analytical, formal, and forceful, emphasizing the gravity of the security situation and Europe's vulnerability. Both historical references (9/11, the Cold War) and emotional imagery (Sweden as a lost suitcase) are employed, alongside clear logical arguments framing defense spending as an investment. The tone is critical of the European Union's sluggishness and NATO members' failure to meet their commitments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (230 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

The rhetorical style is formal and authoritative, centering on logical reasoning and the extraction of technical details. The speaker challenges the presenter's expertise, expecting them to be thoroughly versed in the special taxation regime, and adopts a skeptical and demanding tone.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Bill (217 SE) to Amend the Income Tax Act

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

The address is formal and procedural, utilizing courteous salutations directed at the Vice-Chairman of the Riigikogu and the rapporteur. The emphasis is placed on a logical and informative appeal, requiring specific technical clarifications concerning the taxation mechanisms. The tone is businesslike and centered on the significance of the subject matter for the full assembly.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling