By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the draft legislation (Isamaa) and their proposal, which was deemed unreasonable and irrational. The criticism is rooted in the political and legal framework, pointing out conflicts with EU directives and inadequate risk analysis.

There is not enough data.

The primary criticism is aimed at the bill's initiators (including Anastassia), who are accused of addressing the problem too narrowly and ignoring the actual situation. The criticism is based both on policy and motive, suggesting that the bill is merely a political "propaganda topic" designed to attack Bolt and gain votes. The speaker emphasizes that the bill fails to solve the actual underlying problem.

The primary objection is aimed at the claims and analysis put forth by the presenter, which are considered inaccurate regarding the impacts on the energy sector and the labor market. The criticism is substantive and policy-driven, focusing specifically on the soundness of the underlying assumptions within the context of the manufacturing industry.

Insufficient data