By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

The speaker demonstrated a willingness to cooperate at the committee level, as they were appointed by consensus as the representative of the lead committee. A structured discussion took place within the committee, resulting in a clear proposal to reject the draft legislation (7 votes in favor, 3 against).

The style of cooperation is direct and geared toward information gathering, involving active participation in the question-and-answer session to gain clarity on the regulation and understand its limits.

The speaker is working in collaboration with the commission and the ministries, referencing the consensual appointment of the rapporteur and discussions held with the Ministry of Finance and the LKF (Estonian Motor Insurers' Bureau). They emphasize the need to continue the discussion with the relevant ministry in order to find a broader and more comprehensive regulation. They also acknowledge the contributions of other colleagues (e.g., Urve Tiidus) to these discussions.

Not enough data

The cooperative approach is solution-oriented and pragmatic, showing a willingness to overcome procedural hurdles, such as proposing the inclusion of Toomas Kivimäe in the leadership. The nuclear energy decision was initiated with broad support from members of the Riigikogu, pointing to cross-factional cooperation (55 signatures).