By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

Supports the regulation (mandatory motor insurance) as a necessary tool for mitigating risks and preventing major losses, even if the annual cost is low (€5–€6). It is considered important that the insurance covers damages to other parties, not just the owner's own assets.

The economic views relate to the impact of the regulation (the Battery Passport) on manufacturers and businesses that construct batteries for internal use (e.g., within production facilities), emphasizing the necessity of clearly differentiating between market sales and self-consumption when assessing the regulatory burden.

Economic views lean towards cautious regulation, specifically avoiding excessive strictness when transposing the EU directive, so as not to stifle innovation. Support is given to the Ministry of Finance's stance that including lighter vehicles under the mandatory insurance obligation could inhibit innovation. Regulation based on statistics and impact analysis is preferred.

The economic views emphasize the specifics of the manufacturing industry and the need to account for electricity consumption and price forecasts. It is also stressed that the monthly salary must reflect the employee's contribution and volume of work, and should the number of critical deadlines change significantly, this salary will likely be subject to review.

Economic perspectives focus on supporting national energy development, emphasizing the need to study the market viability, suitability, and necessity of nuclear energy. This indicates a policy geared toward long-term economic growth and energy security.