By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The style is formal and respectful, utilizing standard forms of address when referring to the Speaker of the Riigikogu and the Prime Minister. On the topic of healthcare, the tone is concerned and critical, relying on logical arguments and factual examples to underscore the seriousness of the issue. The speaker employs strong language to describe the problem ("very complicated," "abnormal").

The style is formal and respectful, addressing the presiding officer and the Prime Minister. The speaker employs logical argumentation, posing a question based on a premise concerning a specific action plan. The tone is matter-of-fact and questioning, steering clear of emotional appeals.

The style is polite, respectful, and interrogative, using the salutation "Dear Martin!". The tone is conciliatory, beginning with a compliment about the thoroughness of the colleague's draft, followed by a direct political question.

The style is formal and question-oriented, addressing the Minister respectfully. The speaker employs rhetoric to emphasize potential negative consequences (e.g., the loss of teachers) and the necessity of informing the public. Regarding security matters, the tone is direct and concerned, even while acknowledging the potential classification of the answer as a state secret.

The rhetorical style is one of concern and urgency, particularly regarding the issue of education, emphasizing the seriousness of the problem ("This is a serious problem"). Direct and challenging questions are employed to call into question the results of the government's actions and the success of its programs. The tone is formal, addressing the Prime Minister directly.

The rhetorical style is urgent, critical, and data-driven, contrasting the Prime Minister's alleged optimism with harsh economic indicators. Logical appeals are employed, supported by specific statistical data and quotes, and direct questions are posed to the Prime Minister regarding the government's poor decisions. The tone is formal and concerned.

The style is formal and direct, addressing the minister respectfully ("Esteemed Minister!"). The speaker poses clear questions concerning specific decisions (closures) and analyses (the inclusion of refugees), emphasizing the necessity of knowing the final decision or the time when the discussion will resume. The rhetoric is logical and focuses on finding practical solutions.