By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The speaker focuses on two crucial policy areas: modern financial regulation (cryptocurrency) and the critical state of social infrastructure (healthcare). Concerning healthcare, strong concern was expressed regarding doctors migrating abroad due to excessive workload and the existing wage disparity, leading to performance-based criticism directed at the government. The position on cryptocurrency is exploratory, specifically questioning its potential as a tax instrument in Estonia.

The speaker's primary focus is on strengthening the role of research and development (R&D) and universities. They moderately support a policy that links the presence of universities in counties to regional development. Their stance is policy- and performance-based, concentrating on identifying whether a concrete action plan is in place.

Political activity focuses on the discussion of bills during the Riigikogu plenary session. The question of progressive income tax is being brought to the forefront, and specific vision and support are being requested for it, indicating a policy-based framework.

The political focus is divided between national defense (strengthening the eastern border, evacuation plans) and social problems (the bottlenecks of transitioning to Estonian-language education). The speaker expresses concern about existing problems, especially regarding the language proficiency and age structure of extracurricular education teachers. The stance is moderately critical, demanding clarity from the government in the implementation of both security and education policies. The speaker refers to the Center Party's position on the topic of the transition to Estonian-language education.

The political position centers on two critical national problems: the severe shortage of teachers and the success of the green transition program being called into question. The approach is results-based, emphasizing concern over who will teach the children and whether long-term energy strategies are failing. These stances are deeply worried and challenge the government's capacity.

The political position is highly critical of the government's actions, focusing specifically on the economic recession and the failures of its energy policy. The core priorities are guaranteeing affordable electricity prices and halting the rise in unemployment, while demanding concrete rescue plans from the government. This political framework is results-oriented, casting doubt on the government's competence to make sound decisions.

The political focus centers on education policy, particularly the issue of closing regional gymnasium departments, drawing attention to the situation facing the schools in Toila and Kiviõli. Another key stance involves leveraging the education and skills of Ukrainian refugees to expand Estonia's teaching workforce. This approach is pragmatic and outcome-based, demanding clear decisions and thorough analysis from the ministry.