By Months: Züleyxa Izmailova

The opposition's stance is strong, directed squarely at the Prime Minister and at Estonia, which has long been governed by the Reform Party. The criticism is primarily policy- and performance-based, accusing the government of creating systemic deficiencies and failing to provide adequate financial resources for ensuring internal security. The government is also criticized for procedural errors in the legislative process.

The main opponents are the governing coalition, especially the Reform Party and Eesti 200, as well as Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi. The criticism is intense and addresses both political choices (lowering taxes for the wealthy, reducing the gambling tax) and administrative competence (the maximum budget deficit, the accumulation of residual funds in the Ministry of Education). The government is being accused of having "run out of good ideas."

The main opponent is the government and the coalition, which are being criticized for a lack of focus, policy uncertainty, and unfair decisions. Criticism is aimed at both political errors (foreign labor vs. youth unemployment) and procedural flaws (State Audit Office observations, selection of the advisory board). Separately, the government's plan to sign an analysis contract with a private company is being criticized, raising suspicions that the ministry's own competence is being distrusted.

The primary target is the government led by the Reform Party and its ministers, who stand accused of serving the interests of monopolists and obstructing fair competition. Criticism is directed both at specific political decisions (tax policy, labor law) and systemic failures (the Prosecutor's Office, lack of transparency). The attacks are intense, accusing the government of negligence.

The primary opponent is the Reform Party and Michal’s government, which stands accused of undermining democracy, serving narrow business interests, and eroding the foundations of the state. The criticism is intense and accusatory, focusing both on the substance of the policies (logging, tax policy) and the lack of transparency and inclusion in decision-making processes. The government is also accused of "retroactively legitimizing state-level forest theft" and weakening democratic institutions under the banner of reducing bureaucracy.

Strong opposition is aimed at the Prosecutor's Office, whose value judgments (specifically, the link established between rape and bodily harm) are deemed to be in conflict with Estonian law and the national value system. The government is criticized for the instability and lack of clarity in its climate and nature conservation policies, with critics accusing them of subordinating nature to economic boundaries. The criticism is mainly policy- and value-driven, demanding accountability and resignation.

The speaker is clearly in opposition, directly criticizing the Prime Minister, Finance Minister Ligi, and Kristen Michal. The criticism is aimed at the government's policy regarding the lowering of the wage criterion for foreign labor, the utilization of natural resources, and tax policy. Procedural shortcomings are also criticized, such as a key minister lacking NATO security clearance.

The criticism is aimed at the responsible politicians, both current and future, whose inaction or sluggishness in implementing global climate measures has exacerbated the problem. The criticism is based on performance and inaction, not a direct attack against specific opponents. The speaker hopes that Estonian children will not have to appeal to an international institution to protect their rights.