By Plenary Sessions: Züleyxa Izmailova

The main criticism is directed at the minister and government agencies (Ministry of Climate, Government Office), who are accused of unnecessarily entering into contracts with private companies and underestimating the ministry's competence. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural errors and inefficient management.

The main conflict is with the government and the coalition, who are being criticized for procedural flaws in the formation of a key council. The criticism is aimed at the government's inability to ensure gender-balanced representation that cohesively shapes society.

The confrontation is directed at the actions and accountability of the executive power (the minister), criticizing potential financial irregularities and insufficient oversight within the education sector. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, focusing on the government's overall competence.

The main criticism is aimed at the actions of the state and the government, which fails to cover cancer treatment but taxes charitable foundations. The critique is policy-driven and intense, emphasizing the state's unfair treatment of charity.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, who are being accused of political failure, particularly concerning youth unemployment and foreign labor quotas. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, casting doubt on the state's ability to manage large-scale projects and maintain investor confidence.

The main targets of criticism are the EKRE parliamentary group (for their absence and wasting parliamentary time) and the presiding officer of the session (for failing to resolve the situation). Strong substantive criticism is also directed at the Ministry of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office regarding their assessments of victims of sexual violence, demanding that the prosecutors be held accountable.