By Months: Züleyxa Izmailova

The political focus is heavily centered on national security, particularly regarding the violation of sanctions and the support of Russia's war of aggression by Estonian citizens. Deficiencies in internal security and the legal system are also sharply highlighted, criticizing the government's inability to ensure adequate resources for isolating dangerous individuals and preventing crime. These stances are strongly critical of the government's actions, concentrating on restoring the public sense of justice and propriety.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on sharp criticism of the government’s fiscal policy (high VAT on food, deficit budget) and education reforms. The most prominent issues are the demand to reduce the VAT on foodstuffs and the massive budget shortfalls (107.9 million euros) at the Ministry of Education and Research, especially considering that cuts are simultaneously being made in the sector. The criticism targets the government’s priorities, which appear to favor the wealthy and the gambling industry, rather than the general population and education.

The political position is strongly critical of the government, emphasizing the lack of strategic focus in energy and tax policy, as well as the government's inability to resolve social crises. The speaker sharply opposes increasing the influx of foreign labor at a time when local youth unemployment is among the highest in Europe. The criticism is primarily aimed at the government's incompetence and matters of value-based fairness (gender balance, funding for cancer treatment).

The central focus is on social justice and the protection of vulnerable groups (the Pihlakodu case, families with children, the elderly). The political position is strongly oppositional, criticizing the government’s (especially the Reform Party’s) value framework, which prioritizes economic interests and monopolists over the general public’s well-being and cultural values. The stance is predominantly value- and results-based, demanding systemic accountability and a moral compass.

The political focus is strongly on environmental protection and the defense of democratic values, especially in opposition to the government's plan to log 70% of forest land. Criticism is directed at the government's inaction on climate issues and the weakening of democracy in favor of narrow business interests. The positions taken are intense and value-based, emphasizing national security and responsibility for the future. The speaker criticizes the government for lacking a mandate when making radical decisions.

The political stance is strongly value-driven, focusing on social justice and state responsibility. The speaker demands accountability within the justice system (specifically regarding the actions of the Prosecutor's Office) and the protection of vulnerable individuals, particularly in light of the Pihlakodu case. Criticism is also leveled at the government's instability in environmental and climate policy, demanding a science-based reduction in logging volumes and a logging moratorium. The political focus is directed toward evaluating the government's performance and its underlying values.

The speaker heavily emphasizes economic well-being, demanding a reduction in VAT on food products given the high inflation environment. Furthermore, he stresses the need for a balance between security and bureaucracy, and opposes the government's plans to relax environmental protection restrictions. His political stance is highly critical of the current government's policies, concentrating on policy effectiveness and core value issues (climate, family financial stability).

The political position is strongly value-driven, focusing on the international reinforcement of children's rights through the UN Optional Protocol. The speaker firmly supports the adoption of Bill 534. A crucial issue highlighted is the necessity of addressing the climate crisis, directly linking it to children's right to life and health. This position aims to emphasize future focus and environmental responsibility.