By Plenary Sessions: Züleyxa Izmailova

The political focus is directed towards breaking the spiral of rising costs and inflation. The speaker strongly supports lowering VAT on foodstuffs as the most effective measure for restoring purchasing power and stabilizing the economy. This stance is clearly aimed at political and social welfare, emphasizing the accessibility of essential goods. Targeted taxation is also supported, ensuring the wealthy pay proportionally to their means.

The political focus is on strong nature conservation, demanding the implementation of a universal nesting truce in both private and state forests, and the halting of the deterioration of biodiversity indicators. The attitude towards the government's actions is sharply critical, accusing them of failing to fulfill promises and weakening existing protective measures. The political framework is value-based (protecting nature) and results-oriented (criticizing the minister's failures).

The political stance is strongly focused on supporting the reduction of VAT on foodstuffs to boost purchasing power and break the inflation spiral. This position is framed through the lens of economic revitalization and the improvement of social justice, emphasizing that tax policy must be supportive of the individual citizen. Concern is also voiced regarding the stagnation of the wind turbine planning process, which is being caused by vocal individuals who are not connected to the local community.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the presented budget, emphasizing its large deficit and the negative impact it will have on the country's credit rating and housing opportunities for young people. The speaker appeals to values, calling into question the pro-Estonian commitment and patriotism of the minister's decisions. This position is heavily focused on the failure of fiscal policy and is fundamentally value-based.

The political stance is highly critical of the government, focusing primarily on poor financial management (a maximum deficit) and issues within the social sector. The criticism targets the inefficiency of the government's actions and the misplacement of priorities, particularly concerning education and social security. The speaker sharply criticizes the budget policy, which allocates funds to "the wealthiest" while simultaneously implementing cuts in crucial areas. The political framework adopted is rather results-oriented, highlighting the government's failure to solve existing problems.