By Plenary Sessions: Züleyxa Izmailova

The political stance is highly critical of the government's performance and its delivery on promises. Key social and economic issues are being emphasized, such as the shortage of STEM teachers, the protection of the elderly from crime, and the unsustainability of the current tax policy. The focus remains on the government’s capability to meet long-term strategic objectives and election pledges, particularly concerning the abolition of kindergarten placement fees.

The political stance is one of strong opposition, focusing on criticizing the deficiencies in the minister's performance and lack of transparency. The primary emphasis is on scrutinizing the government's activities and opposing the concealment of analyses commissioned using public funds. The position is strongly value-driven and procedural, stressing the necessity of the right to speak out and robust parliamentary oversight.

The political focus is on the well-being of families with children and protecting labor income, strongly advocating for the abolition of kindergarten fees and preferential VAT treatment for foodstuffs. The politician criticizes the government (the Reform Party) for its inability to fulfill promises and for prioritizing narrow business interests over the welfare of families. He emphasizes that effective national defense starts with a strong home front and ensuring the basic subsistence of Estonian families.

The political position is heavily centered on protecting cultural and natural heritage, particularly the inviolability of sacred sites. The speaker contrasts this value-based approach with narrow economic interests, prioritizing the preservation of national identity and social cohesion. This stance is strongly value-driven, criticizing the government for potentially succumbing to pressure from various economic sectors.

The political position focuses strongly on the principles of the rule of law, demanding the effective enforcement of court decisions, especially those pertaining to environmental protection. Another key theme is the fight against monopolies and ensuring fair competition in order to protect consumers and SMEs from high prices. The position is sharply critical of the government's inaction in both the environmental and economic spheres, and is aimed at improving overall effectiveness.

The political focus is heavily concentrated on the failures of the legal system and the state’s moral shortcomings in protecting vulnerable individuals, particularly in the context of the Pihlakodu case. A strong, value-based demand for accountability and justice is being put forward, coupled with sharp criticism of the inaction shown by the Prosecutor’s Office and the Minister of Justice. A secondary demand requires the government to take responsibility for implementing coalition agreements and strategic decisions (specifically, the consolidation of the hospital network). The overall stance is strongly oppositional and highly critical of the system.